Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

great interview on health care


Azazello1313
 Share

Recommended Posts

It is amazing that elcting one guy would somehow completely alter every single person that works in gubmnet and suddenly make every single politicians . . and their staffs . . and every other gubmnet employee . . . suddenly reverse decades of doing business a certain way. :wacko:

 

First Obama is blasted for trying to institute change. Then when he cant exert his superman powers to reverse the entire flow of gubmnet, he is blasted for not "changing" things.

Yea but was that not basically his platform? Basically preaching on hope and change and along with his "heritage" those things had a lot to do with him being elected. So with not being able to do his platform what are we left (no pun intended) with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 318
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yea but was that not basically his platform? Basically preaching on hope and change and along with his "heritage" those things had a lot to do with him being elected. So with not being able to do his platform what are we left (no pun intended) with?

 

Actually he IS a huge change from Bush . . he HAS changed the do-nothing administration, and he HAS changed the perception in the world that transformed us from being a laughingstock under Bush to a respected responsible world power again. Not to mention the fact that his administration has actually started addressing the health care problems in our country . . .

 

Seems like there was a lot "change" already in the first year :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually he IS a huge change from Bush . . he HAS changed the do-nothing administration, and he HAS changed the perception in the world that transformed us from being a laughingstock under Bush to a respected responsible world power again. Not to mention the fact that his administration has actually started addressing the health care problems in our country . . .

 

Seems like there was a lot "change" already in the first year :wacko:

 

I'm don't agree that he has transformed the US to a respectable nation. I believe that the world nations respect power, not weakness as displayed by the Obama Butt Kissing Tour earlier this year. At least with Bush you knew that he meant what he said and if you didn't go along with him, well, then you roll the dice. Now, he could be doing stuff behind the scenes that we don't know about, but at this point I believe the world views us as much weaker than with the previous administration.

Edited by tosberg34
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm don't agree that he has transformed the US to a respectable nation. I believe that the world nations respect power, not weakness as displayed by the Obama Butt Kissing Tour earlier this year. At least with Bush you knew that he meant what he said and if you didn't go along with him, well, then you roll the dice. Now, he could be doing stuff behind the scenes that we don't know about, but at this point I believe the world views us as much weaker than with the previous administration.

It's not going to make any difference to you since you're Perch by another name and wouldn't give Obama credit if he bought you gold bars, but it is beyond dispute that the new Afghanistan policy is a vast improvement on the old. This includes massive increase in the use of Predators to kill terrorists in droves - and inside Pakistan too. The fact it took time to emerge is also encouraging, IMO - all views and options weighed before jumping in, unlike a recent administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not going to make any difference to you since you're Perch by another name and wouldn't give Obama credit if he bought you gold bars, but it is beyond dispute that the new Afghanistan policy is a vast improvement on the old. This includes massive increase in the use of Predators to kill terrorists in droves - and inside Pakistan too. The fact it took time to emerge is also encouraging, IMO - all views and options weighed before jumping in, unlike a recent administration.

 

That's where you're wrong. It MAY make a difference if I see gold bars. :wacko:

 

And I'm not so sure the new Afghan strategy is really an different than the old - except with less troops and a timeline (so our enemies can wait us out).

 

However, I can reverse it and say the same thing about you with the Bush administration to try an minimize your opinion. So, please enough with the insults already. The fact that I don't agree with you doesn't make my opinion any less valid than yours. And the fact that Perch and I may be similar on some issues doesn't make me Perch, just as it doesn't make you "Yukon Cornelious" or "bpwallace".

 

If you can't state your side without attacking the messenger, then you've lost the argument.

Edited by tosberg34
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I'm not so sure the new Afghan strategy is really an different than the old - except with less troops and a timeline (so our enemies can wait us out).

Less troops? :wacko:

 

Any thoughts on the increased Predator use?

 

Edit: And feel free to post a list of the Bush administration achievements over 8 years. Shouldn't take long.

Edited by Ursa Majoris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Less troops? :wacko:

 

Any thoughts on the increased Predator use?

 

Edit: And feel free to post a list of the Bush administration achievements over 8 years. Shouldn't take long.

 

Sorry, I meant to say similar to the old Iraqi strategy. And when I say less troops, it means less than what was requested by McCrystal (originally 50K, then 40K and finallly Obama gave him 30K). However, I like the increased Predator use.

 

As far as the list of accomplishments - you'll have to wait on that one as I'm just about to run some errands. In the meantime, you could give me a list of Obama's accomplishments if you like. I'm sure that won't take long either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the meantime, you could give me a list of Obama's accomplishments if you like. I'm sure that won't take long either.

 

You can start here: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/pr...se-kept/?page=1

 

Then here: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/pr...se-kept/?page=2

 

 

then here: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/pr...se-kept/?page=3

 

then here http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/pr...se-kept/?page=4

 

And this is less than one year. Again, according to the right wingers he is either ruining America as we know it or he hasn't done anything. While whining about anything and everything there still should be some consistency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can start here: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/pr...se-kept/?page=1

 

Then here: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/pr...se-kept/?page=2

 

 

then here: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/pr...se-kept/?page=3

 

then here http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/pr...se-kept/?page=4

 

And this is less than one year. Again, according to the right wingers he is either ruining America as we know it or he hasn't done anything. While whining about anything and everything there still should be some consistency.

 

 

 

Mission Accomplished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that the world nations respect power, .

 

So you think the world respects Ahminijad, the regime in North Korea and Russia over the US then? :wacko:

 

On a global stage, it has been amply demostrated throughout history that "grown up" nations use diplomancy and reason and only use power and armed force as a last resort. Despots and empires use force instead of diplomacy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. The fact that I don't agree with you doesn't make my opinion any less valid than yours.

 

Actually if people post facts that disprove your "opinions" then they are not attacking you, they are merely pointing out that your information is based on a flawed premise.

 

You can still keep saying the world is flat, but it doesnt make it valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least with Bush you knew that he meant what he said

 

 

"This act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we'll bring them to justice."

 

"And, again, I don't know where he [Osama Bin Laden] is. I — I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."

 

Which time did he mean what he said? :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"This act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we'll bring them to justice."

 

"And, again, I don't know where he [Osama Bin Laden] is. I — I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."

 

Which time did he mean what he said? :wacko:

 

When he said, "Mission Accomplished."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When he said, "Mission Accomplished."

 

It wasn't when he said "If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road."?

 

W sure meant what he said and said what he meant. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually if people post facts that disprove your "opinions" then they are not attacking you, they are merely pointing out that your information is based on a flawed premise.

 

You can still keep saying the world is flat, but it doesnt make it valid.

 

Yeah, thanks Bp, but I don't know what you're talking about here. I posted nothing that needed refuting. His comment comparing me to Perch was what I was talking about:

 

It's not going to make any difference to you since you're Perch by another name and wouldn't give Obama credit if he bought you gold bars

 

That's simply not true - I love gold bars. Besides, I'm really, really trying to give Obama a fair shake but he's not making it easy.

 

And as far as Obama's Afghan strategy being "beyond dispute" as being better, well, that simply isn't true either. It's nothing more than a page out of the Bush Administrations play book with a timeline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, thanks Bp, but I don't know what you're talking about here. I posted nothing that needed refuting. His comment comparing me to Perch was what I was talking about:

 

 

 

That's simply not true - I love gold bars. Besides, I'm really, really trying to give Obama a fair shake but he's not making it easy.

 

And as far as Obama's Afghan strategy being "beyond dispute" as being better, well, that simply isn't true either. It's nothing more than a page out of the Bush Administrations play book with a timeline.

Got that achievement list ready yet? It should be at least eight times longer than Obama's four-page one year "promises kept" list, already posted while you were away. I look forward to reading the 32 page list. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got that achievement list ready yet? It should be at least eight times longer than Obama's four-page one year "promises kept" list, already posted while you were away. I look forward to reading the 32 page list. :wacko:

 

Don't have the list yet but don't hold your breath. I'm not defending the GWB administration. Also, directing me to a left-leaning website like politifact (which is an offshoot of another left leaning newspaper - St.Petersburg Times) showing me Obama's accomplishments is not really something that strengthens your case. And as far as a list of accomplishments, that's all relative to what side of the political aisle you are standing on. For example, if Obama signed legislation that outlawed soda pop, YOU might consider that an accomplishment. I, on the other hand, would not.

 

However, with that being said, I'm still foraging through the links you sent me to what they consider accomplishments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my second favotite, it might come in handy after the takeover.

 

No. 380: Bolster the military's ability to speak different languages

Farsi and Arabic are useful things to know, methinks. The program was begun in 2005 by the DoD, BTW, but it's been slow going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farsi and Arabic are useful things to know, methinks. The program was begun in 2005 by the DoD, BTW, but it's been slow going.

 

So I guess this was under GWB's administration then, wasn't it? Well, there you have it. Accomplishment #1 by GWB attributed to Obama. But is this really an accomplishment? Or a "yeah, that's nice"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information