i_am_the_swammi Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 The GOP's "jobs bill" is pretty simplistic: Get the Federal government off of the private sector's back and jobs will be a byproduct of the recovery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 6, 2012 Author Share Posted September 6, 2012 <sigh> According to the Congressional Budget Office, corporate tax receipts as a share of corporate profits have hit their lowest point in 40 years: Corporate tax receipts as a share of profits are at their lowest level in at least 40 years. Total corporate federal taxes paid fell to 12.1% of profits earned from activities within the U.S. in fiscal 2011, which ended Sept. 30, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That’s the lowest level since at least 1972. And well below the 25.6% companies paid on average from 1987 to 2008. not sure what they include that's not included in the CBO's 12.1%, but the world bank has stats on this and we are pretty high on the list, at least among the developed, OECD nations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 6, 2012 Author Share Posted September 6, 2012 Why do we only have two effective political parties in our country? The only choices out there right now are to support an extremely conservative party or an extremly liberal party? I disagree with your characterization. our two parties are a lot more similar than we are led to believe. it's to their interests to play up the differences to rally the troops and cast the partisan struggle in manichean terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lkirc Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 I disagree with your characterization. our two parties are a lot more similar than we are led to believe. it's to their interests to play up the differences to rally the troops and cast the partisan struggle in manichean terms. That is an interesting take. I am not the most politically astute, but it does seem to me, at least in this election year, the two parties are drawing opposite stances on some issues. Gay marriage, taxation, health care, etc. I will agree at thier base politicians from both sides seem to be similar in that their number one priority is to stay in office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westvirginia Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 I disagree with your characterization. our two parties are a lot more similar than we are led to believe. it's to their interests to play up the differences to rally the troops and cast the partisan struggle in manichean terms. That is an interesting take. I am not the most politically astute, but it does seem to me, at least in this election year, the two parties are drawing opposite stances on some issues. Gay marriage, taxation, health care, etc. I will agree at thier base politicians from both sides seem to be similar in that their number one priority is to stay in office. And there's the rub. For all the left's "occupy wall street" and such, the obamessiah has taken more money from bankers than shrub ever thought about. They are only interested in furthering their power. The only real differences are on a few civil-liberties issues, both want to pander with tax breaks/transfer payments to those groups most likely to vote for them. And 99% of them won't oppose ANY spending if it can help them get re-elected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Square Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 the obamessiah has taken more money from bankers than shrub ever thought about. Is there any source for this info? The best I could find was this. Which states the following: Top 5 contributors to Barack Obama 1) University of California 2) Microsoft Corp 3) Google Inc. 4) DLA Piper 5) Harvard University Top 5 contributors to Mitt Romney 1) Goldman Sachs 2) JP Morgan Chase & Co 3) Morgan Stanley 4) Bank of America 5) Credit Suisse Group I don't really think the bankers are backing Obama this round. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 6, 2012 Author Share Posted September 6, 2012 speaking of blame for fiscal stalemate and gridlock, I just recently read an interesting piece on that, detailing a lot of the inside baseball that went down between obama and boehner when they were actually incredibly close to a far-reaching debt deal before it fell apart at the last minute. it's a very balanced piece, and either side can find plenty of grist for their partisan mill. another article out this morning, talking about woodward's new book on the subject. both of these are very good reading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 A few questions for the group: Why is it wrong and evil to be rich in our country all of the sudden? To my knowledge, no one has made such a suggestion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westvirginia Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Is there any source for this info? The best I could find was this. Which states the following: Top 5 contributors to Barack Obama 1) University of California 2) Microsoft Corp 3) Google Inc. 4) DLA Piper 5) Harvard University Top 5 contributors to Mitt Romney 1) Goldman Sachs 2) JP Morgan Chase & Co 3) Morgan Stanley 4) Bank of America 5) Credit Suisse Group I don't really think the bankers are backing Obama this round. You're looking at this round. Look at four years ago. Here's a place to start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delusions of grandeur Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Why do we only have two effective political parties in our country? The only choices out there right now are to support an extremely conservative party or an extremly liberal party? The majority in power in the republican party are far from conservative. Romney invented Obamacare, and Paul Ryan thinks we have 28 years to balance a budget that future congresses will somehow abide by. If "radical" conservatism is defect spending, then I guess I need to call my fiscal views something else then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Square Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 You're looking at this round. Look at four years ago. Here's a place to start So the big bank money used to go to Obama and has switched to Romney this round? That actually sounds positive for Obama. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 7, 2012 Author Share Posted September 7, 2012 (edited) speaking of jobs....another terribly disappointing report this morning. only 96,000 added. unemployment went down slightly, but only because a staggering 368,000 left the labor force, dropping the already historically low labor force participation rate even lower. also, the numbers for the last two months were revised downward by a total of 41,000 jobs. of those 96,000? 28,000 in "food services and drinking places". minus 15,000 in manufacturing. Edited September 7, 2012 by Azazello1313 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westvirginia Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 Seems like Ground Hog day... I read that somewhere... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 speaking of jobs....another terribly disappointing report this morning. only 96,000 added. unemployment went down slightly, but only because a staggering 368,000 left the labor force, dropping the already historically low labor force participation rate even lower. of those 96,000? 28,000 in "food services and drinking places". minus 15,000 in manufacturing. Sounds like we need better "job creators," because apparently the current ones suck. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 speaking of jobs....another terribly disappointing report this morning. only 96,000 added. unemployment went down slightly, but only because a staggering 368,000 left the labor force, dropping the already historically low labor force participation rate even lower. of those 96,000? 28,000 in "food services and drinking places". minus 15,000 in manufacturing. I could have told you that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh B Tool Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 Just curious. Do Vetrans returning home from a major war and opting out of active service get bunched into the jobless and unemployment percentages?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 7, 2012 Author Share Posted September 7, 2012 Just curious. Do Vetrans returning home from a major war and opting out of active service get bunched into the jobless and unemployment percentages?. they get counted in the unemployment rate if they are actively seeking work and are unemployed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh B Tool Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 I could have told you that move to Washington John, there are almost as many engineering jobs around here as the medical field. Boeing etc hire all sorts of engineers all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 move to Washington John, there are almost as many engineering jobs around here as the medical field. Boeing etc hire all sorts of engineers all the time. I've been looking there too, but Boeing does not hire civil engineers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ditkaless Wonders Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 I've been looking there too, but Boeing does not hire civil engineers. Be less civil. I can give you some rudeness leasons if you'd like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 I've been looking there too, but Boeing does not hire civil engineers. "Listen Mr Boeing, I got the best idea ever - ASPHALT AIRPLANES." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh B Tool Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 Runways are made of asphalt and with 2 Boeing fields and three Boeing plants to include the largest building in the world, dat be a lot of asphalt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 (edited) Runways are made of asphalt and with 2 Boeing fields and three Boeing plants to include the largest building in the world, dat be a lot of asphalt Bah, the asphalt plane is an idea whose time has come. I AM A VISIONARY, AND BIG JOHN SHALL BE MY HAND ON EARTH. Edited September 8, 2012 by Chavez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady.hawke Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 Let's add federal workers to this discussion. Obama has added 225,000 more of them at an average salary of $120,000. That adds, per year, 27,000,000,000 - 27 Billion - to the cost of government. Government workers are paid with private taxpayer dollars. The median income in the US is currently $51,413, with an annual tax paid of about $4678. That means that it takes the taxes of 5,771,697 hard working citizens to pay the salaries of the new federal workers. Or about 25 private citizens for each federal employee. And this does not account for their lifetime pensions and healthcare. How is this fair? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ditkaless Wonders Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 Average salary of $120,000 shocks me. Is that correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.