SpinalTapp Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 cbs sports allows commissioner to adjust his position eligibility. He is listed as a WR. Curious what other leagues and other commissioners are doing with him and why... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 cbs sports allows commissioner to adjust his position eligibility. He is listed as a WR. Curious what other leagues and other commissioners are doing with him and why...He is whatever your league provider says he is.No way I'd adjust that as a commish. Youre just asking for trouble now and in the future 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pegos Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Yahoo is keeping him as WR only, lots of people crying over it, I own him and would like dual eligibility, but it is what it is, and yahoo is basing it off of Green Bay's depth chart position designation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awahl63 Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Yup I'm waiting on GB to update their depth chart. I'd love the dual eligibility in yahoo but I'm not going to do anything as commish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Got the message from CBS on him and how to adjust, he stays st WR for now. If the team says he!s a RB then change it. If he were dual eligible to start the season fine. Not giving one team a fiex position that others don't have. Is Pryor eligible at RB or QB? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawgpound23 Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 WR/RB in mine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rileyrott Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 ESPN: Roster-wise, he's a WR, but he has dual RB/WR status as far as lineups go. Kinda weird. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTSuper7 Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 CBS needs to pick a path here. Why leave it up to the league or commissioner of the league to decide? You end up with 11 owners who say no and one who says yes to en RB eligibility change. It's stupid. Just pick a path and make it so. For what it's worth, Montgomery only became an RB out of emergency. We haven't even seen what sort of game planning the Packers have done with RBs on the roster (Knile Davis and Don Jackson). I think it's silly to change his eligibility when his stint at RB could be temporary. If he continues to operate over 50% of the time out of the backfield over the next couple of weeks, maybe then this should be changed. But the Packers played on Thursday last week and had to scramble the weekend before after realizing Starks wouldn't be back right away and neither would Lacy. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpinalTapp Posted October 30, 2016 Author Share Posted October 30, 2016 I am agreement with CBS needs to pick a path here. Why leave it up to the league or commissioner of the league to decide? You end up with 11 owners who say no and one who says yes to en RB eligibility change. It's stupid. Just pick a path and make it so. For what it's worth, Montgomery only became an RB out of emergency. We haven't even seen what sort of game planning the Packers have done with RBs on the roster (Knile Davis and Don Jackson). I think it's silly to change his eligibility when his stint at RB could be temporary. If he continues to operate over 50% of the time out of the backfield over the next couple of weeks, maybe then this should be changed. But the Packers played on Thursday last week and had to scramble the weekend before after realizing Starks wouldn't be back right away and neither would Lacy. Agreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboysDiehard Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Do you get points for skid marks on the bench? No? Then fack it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.