Montana is da Man

Jimmy G throws TD on 49ers final drive

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, LordOpie said:

why wasn't he starting today?

 

SF front office actually thinks that Bethard could be the future :o

 

You made a big trade for Jimmy G.  They should have started him this game and hopefully ROS to make sure he is the future.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure i would want to risk injury for a lost season, on a team with few weapons.

 

only played 3 downs, but i like how he bought himself time (extended plays) while moving through the progressions.

Edited by Bier Meister

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Montana is da Man said:

They are reluctant to name next weeks starter, which is just ridiculous at this point.  Beathard is not the answer at QB

and they need to know if garrapolo is the future or if they need to draft someone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they're trying to make sure they don't improve their drat position too much.

 

Or simply didn't think Garrapalo was ready yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, stevegrab said:

Or simply didn't think Garrapalo was ready yet.

I hate when teams imply that. If the guy has skill, then they need to adjust the scheme to him. Don't force a square peg into a round hole... or just don't draft/acquire the guy.

Like how DEN OC McCoy was fired. If he didn't tailor the scheme to the QB, then he should've been fire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, LordOpie said:

I hate when teams imply that. If the guy has skill, then they need to adjust the scheme to him. Don't force a square peg into a round hole... or just don't draft/acquire the guy.

Like how DEN OC McCoy was fired. If he didn't tailor the scheme to the QB, then he should've been fire.

 

The team didn't imply that, I said it MIGHT be the reason. You have a desire to know why, so I offered once possibility. I really have no idea, neither do most other people.

 

There's no square peg / round hole scenario at play, at least not yet.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because a TD in the final seconds of a game already clearly won by the opponent is representative of future performance. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Tripleshot said:

Because a TD in the final seconds of a game already clearly won by the opponent is representative of future performance. 

 

Against the hawks 2nd team def at that 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Tripleshot said:

Because a TD in the final seconds of a game already clearly won by the opponent is representative of future performance. 

which is why they very much need to play him. Looks like DEN is back in the QB market. SF needs to find out if they are too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, LordOpie said:

and they need to know if garrapolo is the future or if they need to draft someone.

Agreed, give the guy a look, why trade for him and not do that?  I like Bethard and Garraetc has a very small sample size, but on that drive he just looked "legit."  Bethard mostly doesn't.  He looks like a guy working hard and making the most with what he has, but what he has is limited.

Edited by BeeR
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, LordOpie said:

which is why they very much need to play him. Looks like DEN is back in the QB market. SF needs to find out if they are too.

Meh.  They obviously are going to give him a full season to make that decision and don't want to lessen their draft stock.  They don't "need" to do anything this year.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Bobby Brown said:

Meh.  They obviously are going to give him a full season to make that decision and don't want to lessen their draft stock.  They don't "need" to do anything this year.

this

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't need to see if he's the real deal?  OK........

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't Jimmy G an UFA after the season?  If so, why wait?  Wouldn't they want to have a better idea if he's worth re-signing?  

Edited by Trojanmojo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, BeeR said:

They don't need to see if he's the real deal?  OK........

 

6 minutes ago, Trojanmojo said:

Isn't Jimmy G an UFA after the season?  If so, why wait?  Wouldn't they want to have a better idea if he's worth re-signing?  

 

the team has so many holes, not sure how  playing him would accurately measure his talent this year.  they are seeing him at practices. not worth risking injury and lowering draft pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, BeeR said:

They don't need to see if he's the real deal?  OK........

That isn't what I said.  What I meant was what I said. 

Edited by Bobby Brown
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Trojanmojo said:

Isn't Jimmy G an UFA after the season?  If so, why wait?  Wouldn't they want to have a better idea if he's worth re-signing?  

I see the strategy of giving him a modest extension, or worse case scenario, tag him for a 1 year prove it contract.  They should have ample cap space for it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/26/2017 at 6:17 PM, Montana is da Man said:

Maybe the 49ers actually start him next week

Yes, the 49ers just announced it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beathard never stood a chance. He just got thrown to the wolves and jimmy will get pounded just like Beathard did. SF has no offensive line. Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers wouldn’t have a .500 record with that team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/28/2017 at 3:31 PM, iahawks17 said:

Beathard never stood a chance. He just got thrown to the wolves and jimmy will get pounded just like Beathard did. SF has no offensive line. Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers wouldn’t have a .500 record with that team.

You may be correct in saying that... We can talk about Alex Smith as an example why it's crucial to have a decent O-line. Ya know?

 

Jimmy Garoppolo starts tomorrow in his home state on Soldier Field. He's gonna be just fine. (would you start him?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

guy looks great.  shut him down.  don't risk injury.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.