stevegrab Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 50 minutes ago, jamesplante11 said: If they covet Mayfield as much as the media is trying to portray they should take Barkley at 1 and another top flight talent at 4 like Fitzpatrick or Daveport then trade back into the first round and draft Mayfield.....then we can draw more comparisons to Manziel Regardless the answer could be to draft a QB late 1st early 2nd, his name is Mason Rudolph Guy I work with really likes Josh Allen, hard for me to gauge college talent since I don't follow it. I like a QB outside of the 1/4 picks, so long as we don't move up/down to pick 1.22 to take a QB, after Quinn and Manziel I think that move is cursed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 What’s funny is I believe the Bills own back to back 21/22 and that’s a spot Cleveland had been rumored to trade too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 The top 4 QB prospects, Darnold, Rosen, Mayfield, Allen will all be gone by pick #6, maybe 5. There are several teams who would be happy to move up to 3 or 4 or 5 depending on who gets Cousins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdko Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 Cards Giants Browns Jets Bills Dolphins Jags Definitely 7 teams I could see going for a QB in the 1st/2nd. Any more you guys can think of? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelredd9 Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 On 2/7/2018 at 9:54 AM, loaf said: Could be smokescreen stuff though Most things I've heard so far sound like smokescreen. With so many blue chip quarterbacks available but no consensus number one pick, there is going to be more bs-ing than in most years. There is also bound to be a trade or two in those top picks. Personally, I don't think the Colts can pass on Saquon. Lately, teams have been hesitant to draft running backs early in the draft. But the last 5 running backs picked in the first round (Gurley, Gordon, Elliot, McCaffrey, and Fournette) have all panned out nicely. Any team would benefit from an improved running game but it'll be especially helpful to Luck since a legit run game will prevent defenses from teeing off on him. Saquon also has elite pass protection skills. He allowed zero quarterback hits and 4 hurries this last year. He is exactly what the Colts' offense and Andrew Luck needs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 20 hours ago, LordOpie said: don't forget Weeden, also at 22 Ah yes, I thought there was one more but couldn't remember who. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted February 8, 2018 Author Share Posted February 8, 2018 23 hours ago, LordOpie said: don't forget Weeden, also at 22 Or Aaron Rodgers at 1.24. Sure an extreme exception, but it's pointless to play the such-and-such happened like this so it will happen the same way the next time. It depends on the specifics. And IMO the Browns taking Barkley would be wise. Much more of a sure thing and there is no QB head and shoulders above any other among the top few so they could still get one at 1.04. I'd much rather Barkley plus Allen or whoever (or even Fitz and nab Rudolph later) than Darnold and whoever after that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loaf Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 I'd rather have Barkley and Minkah 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 I'm fine with Barkley (1.01) and one of the top QBs at 1.04 (or somebody else that's likely to not bust). I am not somebody saying "must be QB at 1.01, but some fans are saying that, they don't all want it, but many think the Browns will be afraid to pass on a QB there, and have another "we could have had Wentz" situation. Of course they could take the wrong QB at 1.01 and still have that, but at least they could say "well we did take a QB, just not the right one". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted February 15, 2018 Author Share Posted February 15, 2018 Yeah it's a classic hindsight is 20/20 thing. But the safe/logical play is Barkley first, whoever second. Worst case if NY takes Darnold, trade down, they should likely have suitors who are chasing another Wentz/Goff hopeful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.