jamesplante11 Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Jets Trade up to 3 with Indy. Swap 1sts and NYJ Sends 3 second round picks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) whoa. I thought they would go after the 1.4 Good haul for Indy and the Jets most certainly go after a QB Edited March 17, 2018 by tazinib1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 26 minutes ago, tazinib1 said: whoa. I thought they would go after the 1.4 Good haul for Indy and the Jets most certainly go after a QB Irsay obviously wasn’t involved in this deal... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 “The Jets are sending their sixth, 37th and 49th overall selections in this year's draft and their second-rounder in 2019 to Indianapolis.” AAAAaand this is why the Jets will always suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Caveman_Nick said: “The Jets are sending their sixth, 37th and 49th overall selections in this year's draft and their second-rounder in 2019 to Indianapolis.” AAAAaand this is why the Jets will always suck. As a Patriots fans decisions like this have to tickle your insides a little 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 11 minutes ago, LordOpie said: what's wrong with this deal? everyone says that CLE should take a QB at 1.01 if they have clearly identified one QB that is much better than the rest. Why shouldn't the JETS put themselves in a better position to get their QB of choice? If one of the QBs they want is there at #3, but not at #6, then isn't this a brilliant move? The Colts move down to 1.6 from 1.3 and get 3 2nd round picks. Ya don't think that is a tad too expensive???? It's not the move. It's the price they paid to move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Dogs Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Im not complaining!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 Remember when the Bears gave up two 3rds and a 4th to move up one spot....and the 49ers weren’t even in any conversations to take a QB. At least the Jets jumped two teams rumored to be in the franchise QB market 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millworkguy Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Just now, jamesplante11 said: Remember when the Bears gave up two 3rds and a 4th to move up one spot....and the 49ers weren’t even in any conversations to take a QB. At least the Jets jumped two teams rumored to be in the franchise QB market And more importantly stopped another team from doing the same thing (Moving to 3) 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 This may also hurt the value of 1.04 for Cleveland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) Bottom line: If QBs go 1-2-3 Browns will wind up with an excellent player at 4. Be kind of like a second first overall pick b/c they get their choice of QB and their choice of best player at every other position. #Browns -Pat McManamon Edited March 17, 2018 by jamesplante11 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 The jets gave up a chance at 3 front line contributors to move up 3 spots in a draft where the talent upgrade from 6-3 is minimal. Draft as many good players as you can. Giving up that much for that move is ridiculous! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 18 minutes ago, Caveman_Nick said: The jets gave up a chance at 3 front line contributors to move up 3 spots in a draft where the talent upgrade from 6-3 is minimal. Draft as many good players as you can. Giving up that much for that move is ridiculous! This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitpdub Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 2 hours ago, LordOpie said: what's wrong with this deal? everyone says that CLE should take a QB at 1.01 if they have clearly identified one QB that is much better than the rest. Why shouldn't the JETS put themselves in a better position to get their QB of choice? If one of the QBs they want is there at #3, but not at #6, then isn't this a brilliant move? I like how this deal rearranges people’s draft boards. Cle may be forced to go QB at 1 so what happens to Barkley...Maybe Cle was smart to get Hyde as a fall back just in case. Cle should just trade #1 and do their usual with the picks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 10 minutes ago, LordOpie said: Good point. Maybe Barkley is now there at #4? Especially if Denver or Buffalo trades to 1.02. Arizona even? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitpdub Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 I want more trades in the top 4 to really make this interesting. Any scenario where one of the top 3 QBs slide? Anyway that Chub slides to 9 🤔 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gourdeau Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 hour ago, LordOpie said: Taz, it's not expensive... You and cave are wrong, if... The jets have identified their qb and are confident he'll be there at 3. If you really believe you found your qb, then no cost is too much. Upon reflection, wouldn't you have given up your first round picks for five straight years for Brady or Manning or Montana...? I get your point but we arent talking about any of these QBs as being on that level.. they arent emotely close to being a sure thing... they spent as if they were getting the top pick and there is a once in a lifetime type of talent IE Manning or Luck 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) 18 minutes ago, mitpdub said: I want more trades in the top 4 to really make this interesting. Any scenario where one of the top 3 QBs slide? Anyway that Chub slides to 9 🤔 No, he won’t make it past Indy at 6. That’s probably why they were so comfortable moving back. Just like the Celtics did, why not trade back when you can get the same player at 6 and get some value for making the same pick QB QB QB RB Wildcard Chubby Edited March 17, 2018 by jamesplante11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shorttynaz Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 love this as a Colts fan. It's a good trade for both sides. Jets get a shot at their qb of the future and the Colts will still get a top 10 stud (unless they keep dealing) along with two additional quality 2nd round picks to further enhance their rebuilding process. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Brown Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Jets need a lot more than a QB. Hopefully they don't miss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 As a Browns fan I would enjoy them drafting Mayfield Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelredd9 Posted March 18, 2018 Share Posted March 18, 2018 Three 2nd round picks was cheap. Moving up into a top pick when a potential franchise quarterback is available never comes without a high cost. I'm surprised the deal didn't include the Jets' 2019 1st round pick. The Robert Griffin deal included that year's 1st round pick (also the 6th pick), that year's 2nd round pick, and the next two year's 1st round picks. The Carson Wentz deal included that year's 1st round pick (8th pick), that year's 3rd and 4th round picks, the next year's 1st round pick, and a second round pick 2 years later. The Eagles also got a conditional 4th-5th round pick back along with the 2nd pick of the draft. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted March 18, 2018 Share Posted March 18, 2018 7 hours ago, jamesplante11 said: This may also hurt the value of 1.04 for Cleveland Not if the Giants take you know who Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever in debt to mo lewis Posted March 18, 2018 Share Posted March 18, 2018 just a great deal for indy....you could take one of those 2nd rounders out of it and its still a great deal.....nice work by ballard 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever in debt to mo lewis Posted March 18, 2018 Share Posted March 18, 2018 12 hours ago, michaelredd9 said: Three 2nd round picks was cheap. Moving up into a top pick when a potential franchise quarterback is available never comes without a high cost. I'm surprised the deal didn't include the Jets' 2019 1st round pick. The Robert Griffin deal included that year's 1st round pick (also the 6th pick), that year's 2nd round pick, and the next two year's 1st round picks. The Carson Wentz deal included that year's 1st round pick (8th pick), that year's 3rd and 4th round picks, the next year's 1st round pick, and a second round pick 2 years later. The Eagles also got a conditional 4th-5th round pick back along with the 2nd pick of the draft. its not cheap....its a good deal for the colts pick 3 is worth 2200 on the trade value chart.....pick 6 is worth 1600...37 is worth 510 and 49 is worth 410...for the sake of argument im going to assume the jets 2nd rounder next year is in the top 10 of the round making that worth at least 500 points other teams may have been more desperate and paid more in years prior...but its a good deal for the colts and a no brainer for a team that needs to add alot of talent to its roster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.