Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Should The Commish Be Able To Unilaterally Remove Owners, If It's Against The Bylaws?


the lone star
 Share

Should The Commish Be Able To Unilaterally Remove Owners, If It's Against The Bylaws?  

6 members have voted

  1. 1. Should The Commish Be Able To Unilaterally Remove Owners, If It's Against The Bylaws?



Recommended Posts

Yikes...what's with all the caps?  And hell yes...not only should you exercise your unilaterality and remove their worthlessness from the sacredality of your most holiest of leagues, you should also go over to their house and remove all the tires from their vehicles.  That will fix the errors of their ways with your bylaws.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LordOpie said:

are you asking... is it okay or the commish to break the rules?

 

I should have provided more context. Basically, there's a removal procedure that is in the rules/bylaws, but nobody was really aware of it until now. The situation never came up, so this is the first time that the commish and the league members have examined it.

 

Rule says that it should be a league vote, but Commish thinks it is his sole right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, the lone star said:

 

I should have provided more context. Basically, there's a removal procedure that is in the rules/bylaws, but nobody was really aware of it until now. The situation never came up, so this is the first time that the commish and the league members have examined it.

 

Rule says that it should be a league vote, but Commish thinks it is his sole right.

 

Rules say its a league vote and not your sole right to remove a player. You need to step down off your high horse and let your leagues run and stop intervening or you are not going to be able to keep them full for years to come. Just a suggestion from one LM to another

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, the lone star said:

 

I should have provided more context. Basically, there's a removal procedure that is in the rules/bylaws, but nobody was really aware of it until now. The situation never came up, so this is the first time that the commish and the league members have examined it.

 

Rule says that it should be a league vote, but Commish thinks it is his sole right.

 

Sp there are rules none of the owners ever read or knew about, but now that they come up the commish is trying to break them, and the league wants to follow their unknown rules?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information