Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Forced Acceleration Of Dues Payment To Process A Trade?


the lone star
 Share

Is It Fair For The Commish To Do This?  

6 members have voted

  1. 1. Is It Fair For The Commish To Do This?

    • Yes, That's Fine.
    • No, He Should Not Discriminate Or Break Standards/Codes Like That.


Recommended Posts

So an owner in my league made a trade for a valuable player, and I didn't like how uneven the deal was, so I voiced my concern to the Commish. The Commish told me that the deal wasn't as bad as I think because the owner that received the star player was forced to pay dues quicker than everyone else in order to get a trade processed.

 

This is a league with a substantial fee for dues, so we split them into 2 payments. Half before the season starts, and half again after week 8.

 

Do you think the Commish should be able to violate this accepted standard/code and demand owners to pay up earlier if they want their trades to go through? Is it fair?

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, the lone star said:

So an owner in my league made a trade for a valuable player, and I didn't like how uneven the deal was, so I voiced my concern to the Commish. The Commish told me that the deal wasn't as bad as I think because the owner that received the star player was forced to pay dues quicker than everyone else in order to get a trade processed.

 

This is a league with a substantial fee for dues, so we split them into 2 payments. Half before the season starts, and half again after week 8.

 

Do you think the Commish should be able to violate this accepted standard/code and demand owners to pay up earlier if they want their trades to go through? Is it fair?

 

 

Fees shouldn't have anything to do with whether it's a bad trade or not.

 

Also, if there is ever a question about trades, then the league should do a vote to see if it's fair or not.  If majority votes for or against, then accept the terms UNLESS there is a strong feel of collusion going on.   I have seen that before.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, indyrckstar said:

 

Fees shouldn't have anything to do with whether it's a bad trade or not.

 

Also, if there is ever a question about trades, then the league should do a vote to see if it's fair or not.  If majority votes for or against, then accept the terms UNLESS there is a strong feel of collusion going on.   I have seen that before.  

 

 

 

I agree. Thanks for the reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information