dougsul

Unfair trade?

Recommended Posts

Guy traded A Rogers for  G Tate

He did already have another good qb making Rogers expendable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it made his starting lineup stronger then the short answer is that it is fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm clearly missing the point. Unfair to who?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If both owners agreed, and you cannot prove without a shred of doubt that there was collusion, then it’s a fair trade and getting upset about it is pointless 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dougsul said:

Guy traded A Rogers for  G Tate

He did already have another good qb making Rogers expendable.

people are naturally contrary. While using "fair" is completely, well, fair, if you use "equal value", you might get a better response. Probably not. I'll answer you tho...

 

no, not in any remotely reasonable scoring format is Tate the same value/worth/fair as Aaron Rodgers. Not even an injured AR... unless the original AR owner found out some info that AR is in jeopardy of missing several games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dope man said:

If it made his starting lineup stronger then the short answer is that it is fair.

while I think doug was asking about a different kind of "fair", I completely agree with you. Owners should ALWAYS do what's best for their team within the confines of the rules. Always, regardless of how upset it makes the league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, thought this was about the Fitz for Kupp steal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No I traded Tate and received Rogers.  Some owners are complaining.  I wrote this in a way to solicit unbiased opinions.  His team improved somewhat, mine team obviously did if Rogers heals to a point where he can scramble more to get out of the pocket.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, dougsul said:

No I traded Tate and received Rogers.  Some owners are complaining.  I wrote this in a way to solicit unbiased opinions.  His team improved somewhat, mine team obviously did if Rogers heals to a point where he can scramble more to get out of the pocket.

and that's not a fair trade. I understand their complaints. Not that I care. I see odd trades in dynasty all the time, but, of course, that because a 30+ year old WR, even if he was great, has much less value in dynasty

i'm trying to convince an owner to trade me Thielen (2-year contract) for P.Lindsey (taxi squad) and not too much more. If PL is actually good and the other owner is rebuilding, then I think it's a good trade, tho odd

Edited by LordOpie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Shaft said:

I'm clearly missing the point. Unfair to who?

 

Usually to other owners not involved whose teams haven't improved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.