8rattoon

Should I veto this trade?

Recommended Posts

I'm commissioner in a work league. The guy in first (whose team we autodrafted for him because he bailed on the draft, by the way) has never played before but is riding the luck bestowed upon him by his patient and generous colleagues. He has been researching heavily since he doesn't do much at work and is learning quickly. He offered a trade to another first year-player who isn't quite as savvy but I think may be tempted by 2 for 1, even though unbeknownst to her she'd have to drop a player.

 

Trade is:

He gives Buck Allen and Charles

He gets Calvin Ridley

 

His RBs: Gurley, Crowell, Allen, Davis, Charles

His WRs: Cooks, Evans, Lockett, DThomas, Hogan

 

Her RBs: Barkley, R Freeman, Murray, Barber

Her WRs: Allen, Fuller, Baldwin, Cobb, Ridley

 

Should I veto this? I know her RBs aren't great but neither of those guys really helps her. To me this seems lopsided in the favor of the guy in 1st. Plus Cobb is basically useless right now so her WRs aren't deep either. It's not collusion but I don't think it's a fair trade.

 

Thoughts?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s not collusion, gotta let it ride!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless its cheating, and/or collusion let it go. You can give advise, but its up to her in the end. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks fine to me. They both benefit and no one is being taking advantage of. She needs Buck and Ridley is an improvement over half his WR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally I would say no...but any trade involving Jamaal Charles in 2018 should at least get a second look at a veto.  I didn't know he was even still trying to find a job!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, I am confused by the rationale I find here...on another post, people are saying veto, and it wasn't near as bad as this...but now it's, let it go. 

 

In my opinion, it sounds like he is trying to lowball...JC isn't a factor right now, sounds like he is trying to trade based off name. But, it's not your job to manage another player's team, or even give unsolicited advice (as that would be more collusion to me). Definitely a lopsided trade, but I wouldn't call it veto worthy...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, rr23724 said:

Normally I would say no...but any trade involving Jamaal Charles in 2018 should at least get a second look at a veto.  I didn't know he was even still trying to find a job!

 

He just signed with Jacksonville

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A guy is trying to rip off a newbie female???   That's a man card violation!!!

 

It does her minimal good, but it isn't bad enough to veto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.