Sejin Kim

Kamara vs. Kittle and Chubb

Recommended Posts

Below is a screenshot of my current fantasy team. Another person in my league is asking for Kamara, and he wants to give me George Kittle and Nick Chubb. It's a Half PPR league with 4 FLEX spots (OP is the fourth one, which is WR/TE/RB/QB). At the moment I'm not thinking it's worth it, because Kamara catches more passes than Chubb and I'm banking that my other flex options would make up for what Kittle would produce if I had him. Any advice on whether this is a good trade? The second screenshot is the other guy's fantasy team.

 

TLDR:

I trade: Alvin Kamara

He trades: George Kittle and Nick Chubb

 

Worth it?

ESPN Fantasy Team.PNG

Suraj ESPN Fantasy Team.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no way I'm giving Kamara for Chubb and Kittle.. he thinks because you have two RB1's he can fleece one of them. overvalue your stud RB's they are worth more than a TE and RB2.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, he offered me another trade this morning, that was just a one for one, Zeke for Kamara. This one is a little harder to figure out, idk if Kamara sharing the backfield with Latavius Murray affects his production at all (didn't reeeally seem like it did in Week 1), compared to Zeke who's the only major RB threat on the Cowboys and would get more touches. I kinda like Kamara more anyway, but not sure if this trade is worth taking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn’t do the first one for a few reasons but a big one would be that I would be afraid to play him with zeke and Kamara both. Especially if it’s after hill comes back. 

The second one I would probably do in non ppr and probably stay put in ppr even though zeke is supposed to get more targets. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe see if you can bounce henry and diggs for chubb. im thinkin henry is high and chubb is slightly low right now

Edited by gunterville69

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it seems like he really wants Kamara, so I would do if the deal was good enough. Just checking some stats from last year, Elliot had more to total yards. Receptions were closer than I thought . Elliot had 77, Kamara had 81. I would probably do Elliot and Kelce(103 rec. last year) for Kamara and Lindsay. Kelce would give you a better flex option than Linsay. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But if I have Diggs, wouldnt getting Kelce be a little redundant? I feel like WR/TE have a lower floor than RBs, who can catch passes also, which I feel gives me a more consistent production week to week

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kelce is better than Lindsay in your starting line up. You already have Thielen, I wouldn't want to start 2 WR's from the same team unless I had to. Once Diggs has good game, I would look to trade him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.