Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Robert Woods, John Brown or Terry McLaurin?


Chiefthawk
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Briggssteel said:

Yeah I have Woods and McLauren and I’m starting Woods because the Falcons secondary is so bad. McLauren has a horrible matchup with SF this weekend. 

 

In his last horrible matchup (CHI), he had 70 and a TD. I think he is pretty much a lock to have a good game, as the only legit weapon in their passing game. Woods against ATL is a solid play too, but Goff has been playing like crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Zephy said:

 

In his last horrible matchup (CHI), he had 70 and a TD. I think he is pretty much a lock to have a good game, as the only legit weapon in their passing game. Woods against ATL is a solid play too, but Goff has been playing like crap.

 

I get where you’re coming from but I’m not playing anyone against SF this year I don’t think unless they’re an elite RB. If Terry performs in this game then I’ll declare him matchup proof and I’ll never sit him again. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Briggssteel said:

I get where you’re coming from but I’m not playing anyone against SF this year I don’t think unless they’re an elite RB. If Terry performs in this game then I’ll declare him matchup proof and I’ll never sit him again. 

 

Fair enough. The only game Terry has not performed was against NE (maybe the only DEF better than SF right now), so there is that in favor of your argument. We shall see!

Edited by Zephy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Zephy said:

 

Fair enough. The only game Terry has not performed was against NE (maybe the only DEF better than SF right now), so there is that in favor of your argument. We shall see!

I think SF may be better. New England is better for Fantasy because they're so opportunistic, but in terms of just shutting an offense down, San Francisco has been unreal. I know Goff has been great this year but 78 yards? That's absurd. McLaurin is great but Keenum still has to be able to get him the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Briggssteel said:

I think SF may be better. New England is better for Fantasy because they're so opportunistic, but in terms of just shutting an offense down, San Francisco has been unreal. I know Goff has been great this year but 78 yards? That's absurd. McLaurin is great but Keenum still has to be able to get him the ball. 

 

Yeah, maybe. I mean the NE def has allowed fewer TDs (only 3 on the season), fewer rushing yards per game, fewer total yards per game, 8 more sacks, more than twice as many turnovers.

 

In any case, they are both great, and they very well could shut him down. We will find out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have these same receivers.

I rank them this week as 

John Brown

Robert Woods

Terry this week.

 

John Brown is a good football player who's gonna get his in this matchup.

Bobby Woods didnt have a catch for the first time in like 3 years last week. His feelings are hurt and he is good in the good matchups this year.

Terry is amazing and will probably be a top 10 play but his matchup though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zephy said:

 

In his last horrible matchup (CHI), he had 70 and a TD. I think he is pretty much a lock to have a good game, as the only legit weapon in their passing game. Woods against ATL is a solid play too, but Goff has been playing like crap.

Time to treat him as a legit WR1, start him regardless of the match up and how bad his team is...he's like the Chubb of the WRs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information