Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Traded T. Lockette for E. Ingram & Sterling Sheperd


gijoerock
 Share

Recommended Posts

I lost W. Dissly to a season ending injury and the waiver wire did not offer much. My current roster for 10 team .5 ppr is listed below:

 

P Mahomes

M. Thomas

T. Lockette (traded)

K. Johnson

T. Coleman

Vacant (TE)

C. Sutton (flex)

H. Butker

Buffalo (def)

 

Bench:

J. Conner

F. Gore

MVS

T. McLaurin

J. Brissett

San Francisco

Edited by gijoerock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Montana is da Man said:

Meh, lockett is the beat of the 3

 

My options on the waiver wire were J. Witten, J. Graham, Atkins, and Fells.  With every manager holding onto at least 2 TE's, I figure it's time to trade. Praying Seattle continue to remain a run first team and this does not come back to bite me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Seahawks have the easiest pass schedule the rest of the season,   Engram is solid, but honestly I don't like taking two Giants if Shepard is going to be  a weekly starter.  Their passing game isn't all that great and when Saquon comes back they are going to run more and he is going to take away targets as well.

I see your need so I hope it works out for you.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, JAWN said:

The Seahawks have the easiest pass schedule the rest of the season,   Engram is solid, but honestly I don't like taking two Giants if Shepard is going to be  a weekly starter.  Their passing game isn't all that great and when Saquon comes back they are going to run more and he is going to take away targets as well.

I see your need so I hope it works out for you.

Fully understand your logic. I didn't need Shepherd. The manager threw him in as a bonus. Lockett versus Engram is a very lopsided trade. I hope and pray it works out for us both 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, saman1812 said:

TE is so shallow and Engram has been performing when healthy. The issue is that you dont really have a second WR if you give up Lockett. You have a lot of RB depth, would it make more sense to deal from that?

Its a 2 WR league with a flex WR/TE/RB. I am very comfortable with C. Sutton and T McLaurin filling in the gap for the loss of Lockette. Conner is an every week RB1 after his bye week and all I need from Engram is 10 - 12 points per week. My defenses have been scoring double digit points to assist. I think we will be okay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information