Sign in to follow this  
E man

Dude is upset if this veto...what say yall

Recommended Posts

So I'll set the scene for you it's a 12-team PPR

 

1.  Guy 3-8 has a lot of chiefs and chargers on his team which are both on byes this week wants to give up his Melvin Gordon and Jack Doyle.

 

2.  Guy#2 who is on the playoff bubble would receive Gordon & Doyle but have to give up Royce Freeman and Marquise Brown

 

So far people vetoed it because the guy who was heavy on chargers and chiefs is now in major by week problems and doesn't want to do any wavering and this is the last week of our leagues trading....

 

Do you all think we should have let this go or keep up with the veto a bunch of us are saying a guy who is 3 + 8 and note chance of the playoffs shouldn't be giving up some stud like Gordon for something smaller to just field the team

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why we did trade deadlines in my leagues. Little stuff like this can be annoying...

 

But I do not really believe in vetoing trades. Team 2 should have to give up something more imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have vetoed the trade looking past the situation.

 

Trading Melvin Gordon for Freeman and Brown wouldnt even be enough imho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jbusiness29 said:

This is why we did trade deadlines in my leagues. Little stuff like this can be annoying...

 

But I do not really believe in vetoing trades. Team 2 should have to give up something more imo.

We have a week 12 trade deadline to make some moves but the guy didn't plan his bye weeks appropriately which is why everyone's vetoing it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade is not horrible.

 

Freeman MEH....Marquise has upside for ROS.

 

Gordon is solid, but not as good as other RBs.  Ekeler is still a lot of touches.  Doyle is okay and just as much injury risk as Marquise.

 

Guy with all the byes has to do something even if not ideal.  At least he is trying to do something than just eat the loss.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, XFlash said:

Trade is not horrible.

 

Freeman MEH....Marquise has upside for ROS.

 

Gordon is solid, but not as good as other RBs.  Ekeler is still a lot of touches.  Doyle is okay and just as much injury risk as Marquise.

 

Guy with all the byes has to do something even if not ideal.  At least he is trying to do something than just eat the loss.

 

 

Yeah I am with you. I try to stay away from vetoing trades. It is his team and Gordon has not been an all star

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, E man said:

So I'll set the scene for you it's a 12-team PPR

 

1.  Guy 3-8 has a lot of chiefs and chargers on his team which are both on byes this week wants to give up his Melvin Gordon and Jack Doyle.

 

2.  Guy#2 who is on the playoff bubble would receive Gordon & Doyle but have to give up Royce Freeman and Marquise Brown

 

So far people vetoed it because the guy who was heavy on chargers and chiefs is now in major by week problems and doesn't want to do any wavering and this is the last week of our leagues trading....

 

Do you all think we should have let this go or keep up with the veto a bunch of us are saying a guy who is 3 + 8 and note chance of the playoffs shouldn't be giving up some stud like Gordon for something smaller to just field the team

 

So I am guessing you are "Guy #1"? Haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Set the Trade Deadline earlier. This shouldn't even be an issue. Only 2 to 3 weeks left in the season before fantasy playoffs.

 

I would have this vetoed too, sorry. Gordon alone isn't enough for those 2...

 

I mean, it really depends on the team, but still.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is, your league's trading deadlines should be much earlier to avoid this. I don't believe in restricting trades. If someone takes advantage, and capitalizes on a trade, good for them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Zephy said:

 

So I am guessing you are "Guy #1"? Haha.

No but this mite break the league....sigh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.