Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

DL Myles Garrett reinstated


Big John
 Share

Recommended Posts

I guess I'm a little confused with this argument of assault.  Almost EVERY sport technically has assault in it.  Hockey players should all be sued and thrown in jail according to this logic.  B-Ball and Baseball players have bench clearing brawls, a college basketball player even picked up a chair recently.  That is equally as bad if not worse than a helmet.  Honestly, wielding a stick is the most dangerous by far!  So I guess we should just quit the game of hockey because a high stick happens all the time and should be considered assault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NAUgrad said:

I guess I'm a little confused with this argument of assault.  Almost EVERY sport technically has assault in it.  Hockey players should all be sued and thrown in jail according to this logic.  B-Ball and Baseball players have bench clearing brawls, a college basketball player even picked up a chair recently.  That is equally as bad if not worse than a helmet.  Honestly, wielding a stick is the most dangerous by far!  So I guess we should just quit the game of hockey because a high stick happens all the time and should be considered assault.

 

Maybe taking a guys stick and beating him with it is assault? No? Sounds like assault to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whomper said:

Garret with a well executed race card. works every time !

 

1 hour ago, League_Champion said:

 

Everytime!! It's fool proof. 

If he did or not, it's irrelevant and should have no influence on the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shaft said:

If he did or not, it's irrelevant and should have no influence on the case.

 

Well it did. Goodell ran so fast from this as soon as he heard the "N" word it's not funny. As soon as that word is uttered it's over, and Garrett knew it. He's scum, he buried that kid and ruined any chance he had of getting endorsements just to save his own ass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, League_Champion said:

 

Well it did. Goodell ran so fast from this as soon as he heard the "N" word it's not funny. As soon as that word is uttered it's over, and Garrett knew it. He's scum, he buried that kid and ruined any chance he had of getting endorsements just to save his own ass. 

I'm confused. Garrett got the stiffest punishment EVER for an on field incident and you're saying the commissioner bent over because of a racial slur? Do you have any proof of this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shaft said:

I'm confused. Garrett got the stiffest punishment EVER for an on field incident and you're saying the commissioner bent over because of a racial slur? Do you have any proof of this? 

 

I'm sorry, is he an angel now? 

 

Garrett had been fined $50,000 for several penalties, notably punching Delanie Walker of the Tennessee Titans and two roughing-the-passer plays on Jets quarterback Trevor Siemian, one of which ended his season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, League_Champion said:

 

I'm sorry, is he an angel now? 

 

Garrett had been fined $50,000 for several penalties, notably punching Delanie Walker of the Tennessee Titans and two roughing-the-passer plays on Jets quarterback Trevor Siemian, one of which ended his season.

 

Not saying he's an angel, but you keep bringing up this racial slur like it had some influence on the Commissioner. I'm saying it's hard to say that was the case when he got the toughest penalty ever. I'm just failing to see the logic in your argument.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Shaft said:

Not saying he's an angel, but you keep bringing up this racial slur like it had some influence on the Commissioner. I'm saying it's hard to say that was the case when he got the toughest penalty ever. I'm just failing to see the logic in your argument.  

 

You don't get it. Of course it had an influence. The N word is cryptonite to the NFL and it's sponsors. Goody wants this thing to go away asap. You know as well as I do that Rudolph never said that. But you appear to defend Garrett, why is that? Tell us your agenda here. 

Edited by League_Champion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, League_Champion said:

 

You don't get it. Of course it had an influence. The N word is cryptonite to the NFL and it's sponsors. Goody wants this thing to go away asap. You know as well as I do that Rudolph never said that. But you appear to defend Garrett, why is that? Tell us your agenda here. 

I probably hate Goodell more than anyone here and would love to agree, but I still think you're off base here.

 

As for Rudolph, the guy acted like a dbag on the field, regardless if he said it or not. If I were a company looking for someone to endorse my product, it sure wouldn't be him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, League_Champion said:

 

You don't get it. Of course it had an influence. The N word is cryptonite to the NFL and it's sponsors. Goody wants this thing to go away asap. You know as well as I do that Rudolph never said that. But you appear to defend Garrett, why is that? Tell us your agenda here. 

Agenda???!!! Dude, you're on something or need to get on something. Everything I stated was actual fact, not speculation. I never defended Garrett and could care less about the man. You keep throwing stuff out there with little backing or evidence and if someone doesn't agree, there's something wrong with them.

 

You're off base on many aspects of this discussion, but to each their own.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rajncajn said:

I probably hate Goodell more than anyone here and would love to agree, but I still think you're off base here.

 

As for Rudolph, the guy acted like a dbag on the field, regardless if he said it or not. If I were a company looking for someone to endorse my product, it sure wouldn't be him. 

 

Rudolph could endorse mayonnaise during the Tomi Lahren hour.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2020 at 3:15 PM, Shorttynaz said:

This makes no sense.  Shouldn't matter if it was on the field, on the street, in a pool, on a plane, etc.  Battery is battery - its not dependent on where it happens. 

 

Ive been accused in the past by a nameless wonder for taking this stance as its the Browns.  I don't care if it was D Leonard, Chandler Jones, P Mahomes or M Thomas (all guys I really like).  I'd take the same stance.  

 

Ive yet to read one valid argument that dismisses any legal penalty for what Garrett did.  Saying “because it happened on the field” is Bush League.  

 

blah-blah-blah


I've yet to ready any legal person who's said this is or should count as assault, or be considered a crime. Just a bunch of whiny fans acting like this is the most egregious thing that has happened in the NFL ever. I guess you missed the Haynesworth Stomp. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously a few people here have too much starch in their shorts and it is something personal with Garrett or the Browns. Even most Steeler fans I know have moved on and would laugh at these claims that this was a crime and there should be assault charges.


Again I guess everybody forgot about Albert Haynesworth stomping on a guys head, clearing trying to (and succeeding) cause injury. His suspension, 5 games. What crimes was he charged with?  NONE ZIP NADA. 

 

League champ is arguing just to argue, because he likes the back and forth and wants to post 100 times a day.

 

Shorty, I'm not sure what his issue is, maybe somebody tried to hit him with a helmet once and nobody charged the guy with a crime. I'm sure both of them were calling for assault charges on Haynesworth. 

 

This story on the Haynesworth stomp does talk about possibly pursuing charges (Nashville Police and Cowboy's officials). I don't believe any charges were ever filed, because everybody knew it would be a bad precedent to set. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, stevegrab said:

Seriously a few people here have too much starch in their shorts and it is something personal with Garrett or the Browns. Even most Steeler fans I know have moved on and would laugh at these claims that this was a crime and there should be assault charges.


Again I guess everybody forgot about Albert Haynesworth stomping on a guys head, clearing trying to (and succeeding) cause injury. His suspension, 5 games. What crimes was he charged with?  NONE ZIP NADA. 

 

League champ is arguing just to argue, because he likes the back and forth and wants to post 100 times a day.

 

Shorty, I'm not sure what his issue is, maybe somebody tried to hit him with a helmet once and nobody charged the guy with a crime. I'm sure both of them were calling for assault charges on Haynesworth. 

 

This story on the Haynesworth stomp does talk about possibly pursuing charges (Nashville Police and Cowboy's officials). I don't believe any charges were ever filed, because everybody knew it would be a bad precedent to set. 

This really sticks in my craw !

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2020 at 1:28 AM, stevegrab said:

Again I guess everybody forgot about Albert Haynesworth stomping on a guys head, clearing trying to (and succeeding) cause injury. His suspension, 5 games. What crimes was he charged with?  NONE ZIP NADA. 

 

Whataboutism

 

On 2/20/2020 at 1:28 AM, stevegrab said:

League champ is arguing just to argue, because he likes the back and forth and wants to post 100 times a day.

 

Pot meet kettle

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2020 at 3:23 AM, michaelredd9 said:

 

Steve's descent has been sad to watch.  He was a nice guy his first few years on this board.  Now, about 90% of his posts are angry.

 

 

I've got anger issues, I know that.

 

My posts relating to Garrett and the fools claiming he should be prosecuted for assault are not based in that anger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information