DipNut Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 I have LT and nothing else worth poo, I have 5 good recievers and need a solid # 2 running back.....should I part with Ward to get a very young and hopefully upcoming S. Jackson for my dynasty team? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Darkside Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 lets see the rest of your team and the league scoring system, that will make any advice maybe a bit more useful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 I can't imagine any scoring system wherein you should not have said a big ol' YES to this deal yesterday. do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Furley Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 I can't imagine any scoring system wherein you should not have said a big ol' YES to this deal yesterday.do it. 725434[/snapback] Agree 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chires Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 Do it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 What kind of idiots do you play with. DO IT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 Here's another vote for doing the trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 Do it in a heartbeat! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Furley Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 Did you do it yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks21 Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 LOL a guy in my league just turned down Fred Taylor and Hines Ward for Stephen Jackson!! The guy is gonna be an absolute superstar, and just got named the starter. Man I wish I had him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Darkside Posted March 12, 2005 Share Posted March 12, 2005 lets not forget about that marshall faulk guy, he was a great back, still is a good back, hes not going to become this year what eddie george was last year.there is no way faluk is not going to be a factor in jacksons numbers. i dont care if he was named the starter or not, i would not be to sold yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgcoach Posted March 12, 2005 Share Posted March 12, 2005 lets not forget about that marshall faulk guy, he was a great back, still is a good back, hes not going to become this year what eddie george was last year.there is no way faluk is not going to be a factor in jacksons numbers. i dont care if he was named the starter or not, i would not be to sold yet. 731457[/snapback] You have a point but, he has stated he's got 5 good w/r's and nothing to go along with LT. Jackson will be the starter this year and reguardless of Faulk cutting into his carries he's shown he's a good back. He's young and can be kept for some time. I say he should do the trade. Also if you remember last season Ward disappointed us somewhat and there's no guarantee he'll be in sync with Big Ben this year also. This is Ben's second year only and I would think you'll see some of the same from last season, run, run a little more, run alot and then we'll throw the ball once or twice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted March 13, 2005 Share Posted March 13, 2005 The difference between Dynasty leagues and any other kind is large. Hines is getting up there, you have a depth problem at RB, Jackson is young. No brainer. Pull the trigger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shotgun Messiahs Posted March 13, 2005 Share Posted March 13, 2005 I have Hines and I would have done that deal before and than asked how I did afterwards! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted March 13, 2005 Share Posted March 13, 2005 I can't imagine any scoring system wherein you should not have said a big ol' YES to this deal yesterday.do it. 725434[/snapback] wurd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Here's to hoping that you did the deal. While Ward should have a solid season, you noted that you have 5 good WRs and need a capable RB in your 2nd slot... Jackson fits that, and then some. Hope the idiot let the deal pass! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Darkside Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 (edited) lets not forget about that marshall faulk guy, he was a great back, still is a good back, hes not going to become this year what eddie george was last year.there is no way faluk is not going to be a factor in jacksons numbers. i dont care if he was named the starter or not, i would not be to sold yet. 731457[/snapback] perhaps the lesson i will learn here is to take the time to read the topic fully, sorry i did not see the dynasty league mention, then to add myself to the wagon , this would be a good trade for you looking to the future. Edited March 14, 2005 by The Darkside Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 As if you need to hear it again. Jackson is much more valuable in a dynasty league than Ward. Even with Faulk possibly cutting into his playing time, Jackson will score more than Ward, and the following years he will only get better and better. Even if you didn't have the depth at WR, with the lack of depth you have at RB it would still be a great move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 DipNut how about a follow up??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piranha Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Do it. (Just wanted to get in on the action) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Now dipnut, what's the word? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 Now dipnut, what's the word? 734887[/snapback] Agreed. He probably said no even with an unanamous vote. Was it unanimous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seminoles Posted March 19, 2005 Share Posted March 19, 2005 in the voice from Starsky and Hutch "do it, do it, cmon, do it" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.