Tommyknocker Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 I have been offered Edge, L Coles and Jimmy Smith for Lamont Jordan and M Clayton. My current RBs are Alexander, Taylor ( Fred and Chester ) D Foster, M Benett, Pittman, Droughns and Jordan. My current WRs are D Jax, Moulds, Roy Williams, M Clayton, M Booker, A Bryant, T Houshmandzadeh, Roddy White and a couple more of lesser consequence. If this was a redraft Id do it in a heartbeat, but dynasty I need some help. I figure Smith is only a year or two from retirement, Edge very well may be in the same boat, and Coles could be a top 10 WR. Basic performance scoring, 10 team league. So tell me should I???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogo2146 Posted May 1, 2005 Share Posted May 1, 2005 Keep what you have. I think Clayton is better then either of those wr's and Jordan will have a big year. If you do make this trade I think your team gets worse not better. James is a good back but how much better is he gonna be then Jordan and Clayton has STUD written all over him! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jo Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 I agree - I wouldn't do it either. While, as you mentioned, the deal may help you next year, I don't see a benefit down the road. You'd be giving up 2 very promising young players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Nah, don't do it. While Edge is a far more proven commodity, your patience with Jordan (assuming you've kept him around for awhile in hopes he'd start somewhere at some point) will probably pay off here this season. Clayton and Williams will give you a nice 1-2 WR punch for years to come; don't mortgage your future by taking on Jimmy Smith, who's due for a down year this coming season. Coles is a disappointment, he's on my "no way" list. Honestly, I don't think I'd do this trade if it was a redraft league, either. No way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 These Are Real Tommyknockers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommyknocker Posted May 4, 2005 Author Share Posted May 4, 2005 Thanks guys. I gotta agree, I'm gonna turn this one down. Oh and JJ those arent Tommyknockers those is boobs and boobs is good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 Thanks guys. I gotta agree, I'm gonna turn this one down. Oh and JJ those arent Tommyknockers those is boobs and boobs is good. 802908[/snapback] No they're Tommyknockers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 These Are Real Tommyknockers 801838[/snapback] The real part is VERY debatable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Furley Posted May 7, 2005 Share Posted May 7, 2005 The real part is VERY debatable. 803085[/snapback] But very fun to look at!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.