Sturphy Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 I sent an email yesterday already, but since I'm obsessed , I thought I'd note that the default stats for CBS Sportsline look wrong on the customized cheat sheet. When you mouse over the CBS stats it shows 4pts for TD's, -1 for INT, 1 for safety, and a couple more that aren't the case on CBS. The default rules on CBS are 6pts all TD's, -2 for INT, 2 for safety, etc. (right??) So, when I plug the "correct" stats into the sheet maker, they come out different than the default CBS sheet listed under "Popular". The question is: Am I wrong? Or just nuts? Both? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoungBob Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Thank you for the box that allows me to combine WR/TE. We combine those positions in one of my leagues but I have not seen that option in any other customizable cheat sheets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJW Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 I sent an email yesterday already, but since I'm obsessed , I thought I'd note that the default stats for CBS Sportsline look wrong on the customized cheat sheet. When you mouse over the CBS stats it shows 4pts for TD's, -1 for INT, 1 for safety, and a couple more that aren't the case on CBS. The default rules on CBS are 6pts all TD's, -2 for INT, 2 for safety, etc. (right??) So, when I plug the "correct" stats into the sheet maker, they come out different than the default CBS sheet listed under "Popular". The question is: Am I wrong? Or just nuts? Both? You are not nuts. There was an error with the CBS Sportsline scoring system. It's been corrected and the others re-verified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturphy Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 In case these are also unnoticed at this time: Brooks Bollinger listed as playing for NYJ, not MIN Justin Gage listed as playing for CHI, not TEN Tim Carter listed as playing for NYG, not CLE Bobby Wade listed as playing for TEN, not MIN Jay Feeley listed as playing for NYG, not MIA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted June 26, 2007 Author Share Posted June 26, 2007 In case these are also unnoticed at this time: Brooks Bollinger listed as playing for NYJ, not MIN Justin Gage listed as playing for CHI, not TEN Tim Carter listed as playing for NYG, not CLE Bobby Wade listed as playing for TEN, not MIN Jay Feeley listed as playing for NYG, not MIA Look fine to me... now... stupid database... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dade Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 DMD- Why is Brandon Jacops so low on the RB list. I would figure him being a lock for every goal line TD and from watching him last year (because I had tiki) he was a great reciever out of the backfield. I even think the addition of Droughns helps him fantasy wise because Droughns can give him some rest and Droughns will not gonna take any td's away from Jacops because Brandon is prolly the best goaline RB in the NFL. Droughns to me solves the issue of if Jacops can hold up being the starter through 16 games. Jacops last year was the one person in the world that I wanted to kill. This year he is one player that i really want to get on my roseter. PLease explain why Jacops has gotten no love for this fantasy season..And where you think is a good place to take him in a 10 team performance league(Sportsline scoring) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted June 27, 2007 Author Share Posted June 27, 2007 DMD- Why is Brandon Jacops so low on the RB list. I would figure him being a lock for every goal line TD and from watching him last year (because I had tiki) he was a great reciever out of the backfield. I even think the addition of Droughns helps him fantasy wise because Droughns can give him some rest and Droughns will not gonna take any td's away from Jacops because Brandon is prolly the best goaline RB in the NFL. Droughns to me solves the issue of if Jacops can hold up being the starter through 16 games. Jacops last year was the one person in the world that I wanted to kill. This year he is one player that i really want to get on my roseter. PLease explain why Jacops has gotten no love for this fantasy season..And where you think is a good place to take him in a 10 team performance league(Sportsline scoring) Jacobs is someone I am watching very closely because I think there is a lot of potential upside there. My first cut had him much higher actually and I toned it down a bit until I can get a better feel for what the Giants intend to do this year. He has an excellent rushing schedule and I am not that concerned about Droughns decreasing the numbers for Jacobs. Given the risk of a player never having been the FT back, I ended up with him at 19th but I would expect that he will rise in the rankings and not drop at all. If there is anyone close to being a "Gore" this year by really producing big and yet being drafted late, it would most likely be Jacobs to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dade Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 Jacobs is someone I am watching very closely because I think there is a lot of potential upside there. My first cut had him much higher actually and I toned it down a bit until I can get a better feel for what the Giants intend to do this year. He has an excellent rushing schedule and I am not that concerned about Droughns decreasing the numbers for Jacobs. Given the risk of a player never having been the FT back, I ended up with him at 19th but I would expect that he will rise in the rankings and not drop at all. If there is anyone close to being a "Gore" this year by really producing big and yet being drafted late, it would most likely be Jacobs to me. Thank you sir...You are a GOD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.