TheEhTeam

Commish forgot to list that tidbit. I thought it was more competitive coming in with the buy in and how serious some of these guys seemed. I stand corrected. Thanks for the vote of confidence. Yes, a few tacos and pigeons in the bunch it seems

Hahlol, great analogy. But I did willingly pay in with full knowledge of the rules. My problem in the end Yeah, it's a slippery slope I guess. I've tried taking advantage of him, he's tried taking advantage of me. It's not easy because our study methods are seemingly sufficient. I would've never considered making such an offer. Another lesson learned: When in limitless trade league, seek large trades with injured studs included when your team is stacked.

Fair Enough, thanks for the input. I guess I am being sour. My real issue here is one with trading mixed with competitive leagues I guess. The guy that makes the most trades wins. If I shoot my shot at the other 11 guys weekly for all the buy lows and my sell highs, I'll win. I don't put enough time into it to do this. We just need a trade limit for next year is all. Good point. Poor choice of words; I'm not the commish. I wanted to start a vote for veto but will take your advice instead. The guy with injuries had other outlets to maintain his team with waiver but I can't project my logic onto others. Good point. Yes well all do it. I wouldn't have gone sour about it had this not happened 4 years in a row now. One of the guys panics and trades with predator. Learning lesson to take more advantage of people in limitless trading leagues. Well if I hadn't brought it here, I wouldn't have known I was in the wrong! Yes, this is the key. It hadn't really occurred to me as I only joined this league a year ago. I mostly played FFPC and a tradeless yahoo league beforehand. I've made 3 trades this year, he's made like 7. Most trades = best chance of winning if going with the logic: Lets make each others teams better. I truly just thought this was a manure trade but as pointed out above, I'm in the wrong. I said bully to shorten the title. I don't actually think he's a bully. The goal of trading is to take advantage. I just wanted to get input on whether this trade was as manure as I thought it was. Thanks

A trade was just made in my league and I don't like it as I feel it favors a player that always gets the better of the less intense players in the league. It's a pretty pricey league and this same guy has pissed some of our other competitive players off in previous years because his trade bring him from average to far and away best team. Perhaps this is the issue with big money leagues when everyone's not uber competitive. Or I just need to go FFPC mode and get the commish to remove trading. Anyways, if you see reason to veto this vote, feed it to me so I have maximum fire power! If there's good reason and half the league vetos, it can be undone. Not sure if this is drastic enough and don't want to be an ass so if it's too close to equal, tell me I'm wrong on this. Predator gives: Chubb, Michel, Godwin, Hilton, Kittle, Patriots Prey gives: CMC, Kamara, Thielen, Kupp, Graham, Bears My reasoning for distaste here is: Chubb's next 3 games are putrid and Hunt's practicing, will be back week 10. I know there are mixed opinions on this but Hunt didn't suddenly become trash. It's a big ole question mark. Michel's got Burkhead coming back and honestly, what has he gotten this year outside of volume? His YPC is trash. He's nothing without a TD. CMC alone is worth Chubb and Michel with his insane usage in my opinion. Godwin>Thielen especially with hamstring but WR is far more saturated than RB. We have Stills, C Davis, A Brown, D Hamilton on waiver if he needs a fill in while Thielen sits on IR (our league offer 2 extra spots for guys on IR for $5 a week). Hilton is equivalent to Kupp IMO. Kittle is a huge upgrade but he'll lose more with his loss at RB It was a well known fact that Pats 1-7 schedule was a cake walk. 1 more easy game then 5 testy offenses. Obvious upgrade to Bears who aren't what they were and have a tough schedule ahead but defenses are streamable... Especially when it means keeping CMC and Kamara. Okay, I'll shut up. I want your input, not mine! Thanks guys

I like Patterson but that you can never predict wtf Carr's going to do. Reynold's was the #1 choice being against Philly, probably going to be a shootout. I just didn't see the game last week so I'm curious as to why he laid an egg. Did you happen to see whether the targets were just missed throws or he had butter hands? I like Inman, what I hate is that Trubisky is throwing like 15 passes a game because their OC is so incredibly bad. With that said, I just looked at the waiver transactions from last night and realized someone dropped Rishard Matthews so if I can get him, he's probably my definite WR3.

bumpty bump

I'd play Burton this week and ASJ for the rest.

Hey GGL, PPR league. Stuck on who I should play as my 3rd wideout. My first choice would probably be Reynolds against the Eagles but I missed last week's game, you didn't happen to see whether he had butter hands or his targets were just poorly thrown did you? Anyways, my options are C Patterson, Reynolds, Inman, and C Davis. *EDIT* Just saw Rishard Matthews was dropped in a waiver transaction last night, I should go him over any of these other guys right? Currently have C Hogan (assuming he plays or I'm doomed), Trent Taylor, and ________. You may be asking yourself how the hell someone could end up with such a sad sack of WRs? Ask Odell, Pryor, Woods, and K Benjamin lol. Thanks.

Hey guys, Stuck on who I should play as my 3rd wideout. Currently have C Hogan (assuming he plays or I'm doomed), Trent Taylor, and one of the buddies in the title. You may be asking yourself how the hell someone could end up with such a sad sack of WRs? Ask Odell, Pryor, Woods, and K Benjamin lol. Thanks.

No credit there unfortunately but still gonna roll him out if I'm able to snatch him. Thanks

Also Freeman over Collins if he's back this week IMO. Goodluck!

Start Wentz for sure. Seattle is no longer a force to be reckoned with without it's Legion of Boom. I don't think I'd ever start Dak over Wentz at this point no matter their matchups

Wentz every game. MAYBE bench against Jags but even that would be tough. Like the guy above said, Seattle is no longer scary without 2/3's of their Legion of Boom.

That's who I was leaning towards. He plays less snaps but seems to be the play maker of the two

Hey GGL, hope you had a good thanksgiving. Planning on streaming a WR from Oakland this week as Crabtree is out and Cooper may be. Who do you think would be a better play between Patterson and S Roberts?