-
Content count
1,358 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by NavinRJohnson
-
-
The paid content should really be updated. We all know Cook shot up (1) waiver wire rankings and (2) TE rest of season rankings but nothing in the stuff we pay for.
-
The best offer I got on my first cancel call was $60 off for 12 months. I was told that was the absolute best they could do. Set up cancellation date. Called today, got the original offer + 16.50 off each of 6 Sunday Ticket max payment + $5 off my SHO and $5 HBO for 6 months + free Cinemax for 6 months. Total savings = $880 + Cinemax. Stick with the plan and it will pay off. Thanks all!
-
Hello Friends,
A tradition unlike any other.....
-
Groundhog Day. Missing again in 2017.
-
I just called in. Asked for customer retention. I got 20% off the subscription price and Sunday Ticket Max for free. I didn't push very hard either.
I just had the exact same experience. It was actually very pleasant!
-
Looks like it's missing again for 2016! thanks.
-
He would be offering advice. It's not like he is taking over his team. He would be wise to do it via direct message or text and not on the league message board.
So, OP, what is the situation? Is the other owner a complete absentee guy who has been starting hurt players and players on bye all year, or is he just on the lazy end of the spectrum but still checks his team every week? This is a major distinction IMO.
B. just on the lazy end of the spectrum but still checks his team every week
He might even notice and fix it himself. I don't see why that has any bearing on the situation.
-
LOL....I should just send him a text: "Sucks about Ingram".
-
1
-
-
It's my own fault that I got Cam Newtoned last week and its come to this. I'm just going to leave it alone.
If I was on the other side of this, I'd be bitter if someone inserted themselves into the roster dealings of another team to lessen my chances for a playoff spot. But I bet it's done all the time over the course of the season.....over a beer, by text, whatever.
-
1
-
-
Provided you are not the commissioner of the league, I see no major problem with it. It seems a bit underhanded to only bring it up when it benefits you though.
If you are the commissioner, then you should have already been doing this after the first week or two of apparent inactivity. As the commish, if you do it now I would have a serious problem with it if I was another player in your league.
I'm not the Commissioner. Also, I don't think underhanded is the correct word. It's a bit shady and I would feel weird doing it, but I don't think it's cheating or collusion. I'm just making a suggestion that he manage his team in this critical time of the year. Maybe it would be better if I just told him that Ingram is out and I didn't bring up a specific replacement.
It's really is an interesting dilemma.
-
I need one team to win their matchup this weekend in order for me to make the playoffs. Unfortunately, that team's owner doesn't pay much attention and he currently has Ingram as starting RB. I certainly can see Ingram in his lineup this weekend. Is there anything wrong with a gentle nudge, advising him that James White is available on the waiver wire?
Since I'm asking, I'm pretty sure I already know the answer. Just wanted to see what you guys think. Thanks.
-
Much appreciated!
-
I can't seem to find it in the Fantasy Draft Kit. It's a pretty helpful utility on draft day.
Please bring it back or point me to it. Thanks!
-
He's not an RB1 regardless.
I think he's the starter, but it's still a mess. Thomas just made it an official double-stamped no erasies cluster**** the rest of the season. NO has zero reason to treat Ingram (or any of them) as a bellcow. Keep them all fresh, don't give the D any keys, and deflate any FA value for a guy you might re-sign.
The Saints have 2 reasons to treat Ingram as a bellcow. Week 1 and Week 2.
-
Washington homer here...Inside info indicates that Reed is out an additional 2-4 weeks after just seeing the Paul hit.
-
5
-
-
From Game Predictions Section:
OAK 5 27 4 15 27 10
From Fantasy Stats --> Team Position Ranking Section:
Preventing Fantasy Points OAK 5 23 6 10 27 9
Why don't these numbers agree? Team stats vs. Position (QB, RB, WR, TE, K, DEF).
Thanks.
-
If what rajn says is true, Ingram's going to be a steal in most drafts outside of nola.
-
In PPR his upside is probably too high to sit him. I am waffling between him and CJ2K. Will most likely go with Vereen.
-
Big John, can we edit the title of this thread to remove the "WT". Thanks.
-
1
-
-
This has absolutely nothing to do with football and/or injury. It has nothing to do with what's best for RG3 or the Redskins. It's a childish pi$$ing match and soap opera between Shanahan & Snyder. Truly embarrassing.
-
What was interesting (and disappointing and unbelievable) is that the game announcers said that in their prep interviews with offensive genius HC Bruce Arians, the HC phased Fitz out vs. HOU as part of the game plan. Apparently, Arians is blaming forced Fitz targets on Palmer's astronomical interception numbers. That's like blaming the rain on opening an umbrella.
A very new and very special way to waste a talent.
-
RoS rankings are probably my fav weekly feature on the site. I wonder if people know that when you click on a position, you get a nice little upgrade and downgrade tidbit.
Been meaning to post this cudo all season, finally got around to it...Thanks, 2V
-
Pretty sad that the paying side of the Huddle is SILENT about all this....
-
On the other hand, it could be evidence of Richardson being only a pedestrian RB and CLE looking brilliant in being able to turn him into a 1st rounder after recognizing this. Time will tell.
On what other hand? Time doesn't change the fact that a fantasy owner should want no part of the CLE running game IMO.
2015 Bye Week Filler Tool
in Forum Help
Posted
The annual reminder flare....