Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

QB point discussion


PigInZen
 Share

Recommended Posts

OK, here's a question: last year we ran the following point rules for QBs in my league (I'm the commissioner):

 

TDs 6 points

20 yds passing 1 point

10 yds rushing 1 point

Interception -2 points

Fumble -2 points

 

Needless to say, QBs were 8 of the top 10 point earners. Manning and Culpep were nearly ONE HUNDRED points above the next QB (McNabb). Now there's a debate over changing the league rules to either 1 point per 50 yards of passing, 6 points per passing TD or 1 point per 25 yards passing, 4 points per passing TD. I'm in favor of the latter but want to get an idea of other opinions.

 

Your thoughts?

 

edit: almost forgot - we have 14 teams in the league this year. Up from 10 last year. 1 QB, 2 RB, 1 WR, 2 WR/TE, 1 TE, 1 PK, 1 TD

Edited by PigInZen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends in part if you're trying to "level the field" across all positions, or just for QBs ... that latter may be tough to do. Try this:

 

Perfect Scoring System

 

925106[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

Thanks, ts, one of the guys in the league circulated it today. And to think I believed I'd read everything at the huddle over the years... I think we're just out to bring the QBs down to earth a bit. I can see Manning, Culpep and McNabb up there with the Tier 1 RBs but EIGHT QBs is a bit ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you looking ot make it so the positions score similarly, or so that the values are closer.

 

Just because 8 of the top 10 overall players were QBs does not neccessarily mean they were more valuable. Well, Manning and Cpep yes, but they had HUGH seasons.

 

If it were me, the 25 yard and 4 TD would be a better alternative. Better balance between yardage and TDs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like 25 yards per point and 4 point TDs. That's how my league has always done it and it usually doesnt make QBs too valuable. Last year was a little different because of the huge stats that Manning and CPep put up. With 50 yards per point and 6 point TDs it makes TDs too valuable, in my opinion.

 

Imagine player 1 throws for 400 yards and 1 TD (unlikely yes, but just an example) and player 2 throws for 100 yards and 2 TDs, both players score the same amount of points??? That doesnt sound like a good balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've always used 1/25yds and 6/TD in a league and the QB's usually have one or two in the top 5, but never 8 in the top 10 (that I can remember).

 

Does it really matter if QB's score that much relative to other positions, unless you start 2 QB's? Yes it moves the stud QB's up the overall rankings for your league, but tht's a good thing IMO since you'll slow down the RB hoarding in the first few rounds to get a few QB's sprinkled into the early draft. The guys that take a QB early almost always sacrifice RB strength on their teams, but the reward for them is the higher point total each week from their QB can make this up somewhat.

 

We always seem to have good parity in this league which makes it more fun for me at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should do a calculation of the QBs based on your league scoring and the changes you would make (4pts tds / 25 yds) What would have been the results in 2004...just do those top 10 QBs and see where they'd fit in the final 2004 scoring.

 

If the QB scoring drops dramatically, you'll end up with everyone selecting RBs the first 2 rounds...and personally, I hate drafts like that.

 

We've developed a scoring system that balances the scoring enough so that you need to consider what player to draft, and not to draft the 14th best RB before Moss or Harrison simply because there is a RB available.

 

I read and agree with the perfect scoring system proposed here at the Huddle. We don't use that system ....as we built ours over a number of years, but looking at the system and results, our scores and graphs are similar.

 

Good luck....but try and steer away from something that won't make your draft interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fractional points are where it's at. .03 points per yard with 4 points per TD will bring Manning down to the human level, but at 1 point for 20 you're at 0.5/yard. WR's and RB's should get 0.1 point per yard rushing/receiving combined. This gets rid of ties and rewards every yard. If you have a mandatory TE they should get 1 point per reception and WR/RB get 0.5 point per reception. This evens things out a bit and will put Gonzo early in round 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems to work out well with our 12man league

 

Completions (.5)

Incomplete Passes (-.5)

Passing Yards (50 yards per point)

Passing Touchdowns (7)

Interceptions (-2)

 

With this system, there are 4qbs in the top 10 - Manning, C-Pep, McNabb, T. Green

Edited by mhayhurst
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information