SGMONEY20 Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 I have three stud RBs: McGahee, D. Davis and R. Johnson. I know most people rank those backs in that order but I have some doubts. I know McGahee has a load of talent but I am wondering how he produce when opposing defenses are gameplanning to stop him. I like Rudi and Davis because they are proven stud backs in improving offenses. The only knock on those guys I have is consistency with Davis and lack of receiving yards for Rudi. I am looking to deal one of these guys to acquire a stud WR. Which one should I look to deal? I have been shopping Rudi a lot but haven't had to many takers and am thinking of offering either Davis or McGahee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B Man Inc Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 I like Davis over McGahee. Davis has some injury concerns but when he is playing he puts up huge numbers. He is the most important part of a pretty productive offense while McGahee's offense is full of question marks. It's definitely a close call. In my opinion it comes down to what you want to gamble on: 1) Dominick Davis' history of being banged up or 2) the Bills offense and whether or not defenses will be able to put too much focus on McGahee. I would deal Rudi first if you can but since there are no takers I would deal McGahee. You should be able to get a great WR for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AoNrDaYnAge Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 I would deal McGahee first. There is so much hype about him and to me he is still a bit unproven but his fantasy value is so high you could probably get a top 5 WR easily. If you start 2 RBs in your league, I would maybe try to deal McGahee and Davis for a stud like LT and then a solid WR/RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Furley Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 I wouldn't look to trade any of them. If I remember correctly from your original post, your WRs aren't horrible. I'd wait a week or two and see how things unfold, and then make a decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Furley Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 I didn't realize your roster was in your post. You have Andre Johnson as your #1, along with Steve Smith and Jimmy Smith as your #2s. Thats not too bad. Why don't you try and package one of those guys with Dunn and see what happens. If Rudi, DD, or Willis gets hurt, you're screwed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Miscreant Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 I would deal McGahee first. There is so much hype about him and to me he is still a bit unproven but his fantasy value is so high you could probably get a top 5 WR easily. 925457[/snapback] If you feel you must deal one of the three, I would go with AoNrDaYnAge's logic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.