johnsonk2 Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 as your number 2 RB. Ive been offered either or for one of my receivers and I can't decide who to bite on. One thing in Jackson's favor is we award 3pts/rec. any thoughts??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 I would go with Dillon. he does not get the catches as you said. but he does get the TD's. and playing on the Patriots I would expect at least 15 from him this year if he stays healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theeohiostate Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 I have Dillon in 2 leagues, but looking at his schedule and what's he NOT done so far, he may be in for a loooonngg year. I like the upside of Jackson and if i were offered that trade i may jump at it, but i'd have to consider it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnsonk2 Posted September 22, 2005 Author Share Posted September 22, 2005 I'm not real sure I can go wrong either way, as I've been offered either one of them for Steve Smith, but for some reason I am more for jackson than dillon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomfin2000 Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 I'm not real sure I can go wrong either way, as I've been offered either one of them for Steve Smith, but for some reason I am more for jackson than dillon. 1009848[/snapback] Dillon. The Pats always stuggle a bit early. When the cold weather kicks in and they can play their style of game, Dillon will start posting big numbers again. I like Jackson, but he has Martz' play calling to contend with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondop Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 I want to see jackson do well for obvioused biased reasons, but I have to say Dillon. Dillon is steady and usually reliable, and they do seem to like to have him run it in when they get the chance. he might be getting a bit frustrated with his slow start, but he's the much safer play. That said, Jackson's ability is very tempting. he could be very good, but there's much more risk involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coqpens Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Jackson, he's younger, got more upside. too many other options for patriots, and they can also win games by only scoring 14 points. don't know if the rams can say the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.