msmith379 Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 I was just offered a trade McNabb and Jervicius for Bulger and Tatum Bell. I really don't think I should do this trade. Although McNabb has big time upside he also has a tough schedule the next 5 weeks and I have to deal with the him hurt factor. Bulger has a pretty easy schedule the whole way and with STL's D so bad he will be throwing a lot still. Bell is the best back the Broncos have when he is healthy (my opinion). and Jurvicious is good right now but when Engram and Jackson come back I will be dropping him. I feel really comfortable with my team right now and the depth I have. So am I really dumb for not doing this trade? What do you think? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 I'd rather have Bulger. Bell/JJ don't really enter into the picture since you'd not be starting either, but of the 2, Bell's the one I'd want unless desperate for a filler WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRUISER Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 No way I would trade Bulger for McNabb with his health problems right now. I have McNabb and would love to trade him for Bulger. Besides that you would be trading one of your 4 rb's for a 6th receiver. And one of your remaining 3 rbs is an old Bus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emandg Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 Stay with the healthy if you want to take home the championship - if Mcnabb is out than what do you do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msmith379 Posted October 14, 2005 Author Share Posted October 14, 2005 Also I forgot to mention the guy I would be trading with is the guy I will be playing this week. He sucks and I should still win, but I picked up Brunnel to block him from picking up a solid QB against me. But now I am thinking about starting Brunell against KC instead of Bulger against STL. But also if I do that my TE is on Bye. Should I pick up a TE and drop Brunell or take my chances. I really think I will beat him without a TE. Everything I have looked at puts me winning by 30 or so. Thanks for the advice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted October 15, 2005 Share Posted October 15, 2005 But now I am thinking about starting Brunell against KC instead of Bulger against STL. But also if I do that my TE is on Bye. Should I pick up a TE and drop Brunell or take my chances. I really think I will beat him without a TE. 1070097[/snapback] Brunell should be decent this week, but I can't think of any situation where I'd want to bench Bulger for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bsubroncos Posted October 15, 2005 Share Posted October 15, 2005 Take Bulger...and don't bench him for Brunell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishPride Posted October 15, 2005 Share Posted October 15, 2005 (edited) YES! You are Stupid! Edited October 15, 2005 by IrishPride Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumerOneEaglesFan Posted October 15, 2005 Share Posted October 15, 2005 I think I'd do it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titan35 Posted October 15, 2005 Share Posted October 15, 2005 Never bench your studs~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhippens Posted October 15, 2005 Share Posted October 15, 2005 stick with what you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hated-By-Many Posted October 15, 2005 Share Posted October 15, 2005 lol..do it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.