CBEAR Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 I have the following for potentrial keepers: Owens, Chad Johnson, Portis I can only keep 2 I'm considering offering Johnson and Portis to the owner of Larry Johnson. That would allow me to keep L Johnson and Owens. Would you do this deal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsman2806 Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 I have the following for potentrial keepers: Owens, Chad Johnson, Portis I can only keep 2 I'm considering offering Johnson and Portis to the owner of Larry Johnson. That would allow me to keep L Johnson and Owens. Would you do this deal? in my opinion I wont. I dont think Larry Johnson can give u as much as Johnson and Portis, I would keep Johnson & Portis and drop Owens, unless ur getting a 3rd or 4th rd draft pick also I wont do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haskel Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 I would try to package the deal the other way...TO & Portis for LJ. He probably won't do it...but you've got nothing to lose. If he doesn't bite....I'd keep Portis & Johnson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdj7k Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 it doesnt sound like a bad offer to me. what are his other 2nd keeper options? i like owens over johnson this year as a keeper with palmers uncertainty. but you wont go wrong with portis and owens either. i like johnson, but not against owens. i think housh will continue to get a lot of looks as well and be a better value in drafts than chad. their numbers were almost equal last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonorator Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 in my opinion I wont. I dont think Larry Johnson can give u as much as Johnson and Portis, I would keep Johnson & Portis and drop Owens, unless ur getting a 3rd or 4th rd draft pick also I wont do it. this really isn't the question. the question is whether LJ and TO will give him more than johnson and portis. i would say that is a no brainer. i like the deal and how you are thinking ... chad will be impacted by the loss of palmer while TO is set to flourish this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUBJPO01 Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 If you can get that deal than YES. You will be coming away with the 2 best players out of the 4 in question. Easy decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 this really isn't the question. the question is whether LJ and TO will give him more than johnson and portis. i would say that is a no brainer. i like the deal and how you are thinking ... chad will be impacted by the loss of palmer while TO is set to flourish this season. Uh, baloney. Chad Johnson has been more valuable than Terrell Owens going on 3 seasons now. You take the chance on the 32 yr old who hasn't played a complete season since 2001, I'll take the 28 year old who hasn't missed a game in 4 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonorator Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 Uh, baloney. Chad Johnson has been more valuable than Terrell Owens going on 3 seasons now. You take the chance on the 32 yr old who hasn't played a complete season since 2001, I'll take the 28 year old who hasn't missed a game in 4 years. i see where you are coming from, but i like the bledsoe/TO combo much better than the wright/chad combo. it would help if we knew when and how palmer would return. just comparing the 2 WRs talent wise and where they are in their careers, i like chad as well. give me a choice between chad/portis and TO/LJ for this upcoming season and i take TO/LJ. the good news is that he has a great RB/WR combo either way here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suckmyvick Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 Or see if u can give owens and portis for LJ and keep LJ and Johnson if not I would keep portis and Johnson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballjoe Posted July 16, 2006 Share Posted July 16, 2006 Just wondering why you could not keep Portis and package TO and Chad for a stud RB? You would be set with your RB's and get very good WR's in the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.