DuckSurprise Posted July 17, 2006 Share Posted July 17, 2006 Here are my scenarios (I realize they are very subjective): 1.4 - Portis/Tiki 2.9 - Holt/TO 3.4 - Droughns/C.Taylor/J.Jones 4.9 - D.Jackson/D.Driver/R.Williams or 1.4 - Portis/Tiki 2.9 - Holt/TO 3.4 - R.Moss/Boldin/Harrison 4.9 - T.Jones/J.Addai/D.Foster/W.Dunn So my question is to go RB/WR/RB/WR? or RB/WR/WR/RB? difference being in the first option getting what should be a more solid RB rather than a second stud WR. Which way to go? Any advice appreciated, thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonorator Posted July 18, 2006 Share Posted July 18, 2006 no one knows how it will play out, but i like going back to back WRs based on the scenarios you have. it puts more impact players on your team and you should still be able get a starting RB for your RB2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted July 18, 2006 Share Posted July 18, 2006 It is a bad to preplan a draft like this, as unexpected picks occur and a stud in an ther position might still be there and is passed because he is not in your rotation that turn. Try to fill up your draft with the top available players you still need when the pick comes up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildbluefan Posted July 18, 2006 Share Posted July 18, 2006 This appears to be THE YEAR to go with second scenario, there are too few RB locks this year to use 2nd and 3rd round picks on, and the upper tier of receivers appears thin compared to previous years !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loungin834 Posted July 18, 2006 Share Posted July 18, 2006 Go with the best available player when it is your time to pick. Period! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuckSurprise Posted July 18, 2006 Author Share Posted July 18, 2006 It is a bad to preplan a draft like this, as unexpected picks occur and a stud in an ther position might still be there and is passed because he is not in your rotation that turn. Try to fill up your draft with the top available players you still need when the pick comes up. Without a doubt, if an RB falls to me at 2.9 that I didn't expect to, I will adapt accordingly. It's just I know how my league picks, they're RB maniacs and I would expect that only Manning and probably Steve Smith will be gone by 2.9 and the rest will all be RB's. That being the case, I figured to take 2 stud WR's knowing that nobody will be taking their 3rd RB in the 4th and the guy I get at 4.9 won't be much worse than the guy at 3.4. Just a hunch knowing how my league picks, but i'll be ready to adapt if i'm wrong. Thanks guys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUBJPO01 Posted July 18, 2006 Share Posted July 18, 2006 If those are the guys that you'll be looking at in the third, then I'd also go with WR's in the 2nd and 3rd. I think the pts you'll get from having stacked WR's will be more than the available RB's you listed. You can still find a guy like Foster or maybe Curtis Martin coming back or work th waiver wire when a starting RB gets hurt camp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.