SpinalTapp Posted September 4, 2006 Share Posted September 4, 2006 Consider this position the 16th and least important slot on my roster. I have some depth at RB with Portis, KJones, W.Lundy, CBenson, B.Calhoun, and J.Harrison + Buck. I have R.Moss, D.Driver, N.Burelson, and Mark Clayton at WR. Do I cut Buckhalter for Porter or Jennings?h Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheezhed Posted September 4, 2006 Share Posted September 4, 2006 Kinda going thru the same thing with Porter (see my post). I already have Jennings. I would definitely go Jennings here. Huge upside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheezhed Posted September 4, 2006 Share Posted September 4, 2006 Jumped the gun there and didn't realize you had Driver..............aahhh, I'd still go Jennings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpinalTapp Posted September 4, 2006 Author Share Posted September 4, 2006 I am in a weird spot because I beleive Porter and Jennings are the two best FA WRs left on the wire....but they are the #2s to the guys I start - R.Moss and D.Driver. Does it make more or less sense for me to grab one of these guys knowing I own the #1s? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted September 4, 2006 Share Posted September 4, 2006 (edited) Jumped the gun there and didn't realize you had Driver..............aahhh, I'd still go Jennings. I did. Why not? "I am in a weird spot because I beleive Porter and Jennings are the two best FA WRs left on the wire....but they are the #2s to the guys I start - R.Moss and D.Driver. Does it make more or less sense for me to grab one of these guys knowing I own the #1s?" Why would it matter? Fantasy isn't a real team. You just pick the better start or pick to start neither. If Driver(or Moss) gets double teamed all game start the other player. Edited September 4, 2006 by Randall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted September 4, 2006 Share Posted September 4, 2006 Since CBuck has little FF value, it may make some sense to add Porter or Jennings if only to keep tham away from another team in your league, or to use as possible trade bait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobias1237 Posted September 4, 2006 Share Posted September 4, 2006 Since CBuck has little FF value, it may make some sense to add Porter or Jennings if only to keep tham away from another team in your league, or to use as possible trade bait. I would pick up Jennings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziachild007 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Id rather have Porter over Jennings. Sure Jennings is the for sure #2 in GB, but what has he done in the pros? At least we know Porter can put up good numbers when he is on the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.