Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Drop Benson for T. Bell?


Nuke LaLoosh
 Share

Recommended Posts

I took a flyer on Cedric Benson in the draft and I think T. Jones has the starting gig tied up. Both Tatum Bell and Brandon Jones are available on the waiver wire.

 

We start 2 RBs each week and can only have 4 on the roster at one time. Here are my RBs.

 

Rudi Johnson

Clinton Portis

Cedric Benson

DeAngelo Williams

 

Should I pick up either TBell or Brandon Jones (goal line carries for a potent offense) or should I sit tight with Benson?

 

6pts per TD and 1 pt/10 yds rushing/rec.

 

Need to do my free agent submissions tonight.

 

Thanks! Will answer your post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upon further reflection, I think you should drop DeAngelo Williams and add Tatum Bell.

 

 

Yo, you really think that I should drop Williams instead of Benson? Are you seeing something in Chicago that I'm not. I have a nervous feeling about dropping Benson but knowing that Foster can't stay healthy getting out of the shower, I thought Williams would be a great addition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yo, you really think that I should drop Williams instead of Benson? Are you seeing something in Chicago that I'm not. I have a nervous feeling about dropping Benson but knowing that Foster can't stay healthy getting out of the shower, I thought Williams would be a great addition.

 

Yes. Benson has present value (because he'll get at least some touches every week on a run-first team with a killer DEF) *and* speculative future value (because Thomas Jones has NOT done enough to lock down the starting postion, which means Benson could still pry it out of Jones' talons).

 

D. Williams does have potential future value *if* Foster gets hurt, but little present value. Besides, Carolina, as a team, is looking real iffy right now. Maybe Steve Smith returns and everything is hunky-dorry. Maybe not.

 

Look at it this way:

- Tatum earned more points last week that Benson and Jones combined.

- Tatum earned more points than Foster and DeAngelo Williams combined.

- Tatum Bell is always going to get touches, so will Benson. But will Williams?

 

With Williams you're banking on potential. But with the practicle limitations of just four RBs on your roster, I think it's smarter to invest in present production. And with Benson and Tatum, you get both.

Edited by yo mama
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Benson has present value (because he'll get at least some touches every week on a run-first team with a killer DEF) *and* speculative future value (because Thomas Jones has NOT done enough to lock down the starting postion, which means Benson could still pry it out of Jones' talons).

 

D. Williams does have potential future value *if* Foster gets hurt, but little present value. Besides, Carolina, as a team, is looking real iffy right now. Maybe Steve Smith returns and everything is hunky-dorry. Maybe not.

 

Look at it this way:

- Tatum earned more points last week that Benson and Jones combined.

- Tatum earned more points than Foster and DeAngelo Williams combined.

- Tatum Bell is always going to get touches, so will Benson. But will Williams?

 

With Williams you're banking on potential. But with the practicle limitations of just four RBs on your roster, I think it's smarter to invest in present production. And with Benson and Tatum, you get both.

 

 

Thanks for the thought behind the suggestion. You're probably right about Williams. Now I just hope I can get TBell at the #6 Waiver position out of 10 owners.

 

Thanks guys! You can always count on the Huddlers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information