ROCKNE Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 If you were going to drop one of the two which would it be? Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLK&GLD Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 If you were going to drop one of the two which would it be? Why? While Bell might hold immediate value (although limited), Benson certainly has more long term value. Unless he's traded, Benson should take over as #1 in Chicago. They've got waaaaay too much invested in him not to get him in the line-up sooner than later (to the tune of $35mm, or about 3 times as much as Jones). This is the NFL...money talks.,.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
user454545 Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 While Bell might hold immediate value (although limited), Benson certainly has more long term value. Unless he's traded, Benson should take over as #1 in Chicago. They've got waaaaay too much invested in him not to get him in the line-up sooner than later (to the tune of $35mm, or about 3 times as much as Jones). This is the NFL...money talks.,.... ditto that PLUS t. jones will be hurt by mid-season PLUS rat will keep the rbs in denver swapping around so neither can be relied on on any given sunday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaysGoingDown Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 ditto that PLUS t. jones will be hurt by mid-season PLUS rat will keep the rbs in denver swapping around so neither can be relied on on any given sunday The thing is, Cedric Benson hasn't been given that many opportunities to carry the ball. Plus, I understand he hasn't been getting along lately with his fellow teammates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.