Sign in to follow this  
Gros Membres!

Trade Advice

Recommended Posts

Help me out here guys...team is in the sig. I would be trading I. Bruce and Bryant Johnson for Hasselbeck and Ward. Right now I am starting Rivers (was Brad Johnson) and before that was Warner. Hass would at least allow me not to have to think as much about this position weekly. And Ward is bound to come around, right?

 

Or is giving up Bruce and possible stud Bryant Johnson too much of a hit for my WR corps. Roy Williams has been doing well but every year he drops off and is now injured. Chad Johnson has been almost tanking my team single-handedly and Housh has yet to even play a game for me. Actually, my most consistent receiver has been Bruce!

 

My new WR corps would be:

C. Johnson

R. Williams

Housh

H. Ward

 

The reason I don't like it is the upside seems to be limited and the downside is great.

 

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Help me out here guys...team is in the sig. I would be trading I. Bruce and Bryant Johnson for Hasselbeck and Ward. Right now I am starting Rivers (was Brad Johnson) and before that was Warner. Hass would at least allow me not to have to think as much about this position weekly. And Ward is bound to come around, right?

 

Or is giving up Bruce and possible stud Bryant Johnson too much of a hit for my WR corps. Roy Williams has been doing well but every year he drops off and is now injured. Chad Johnson has been almost tanking my team single-handedly and Housh has yet to even play a game for me. Actually, my most consistent receiver has been Bruce!

 

My new WR corps would be:

C. Johnson

R. Williams

Housh

H. Ward

 

The reason I don't like it is the upside seems to be limited and the downside is great.

 

Thoughts?

 

with CJ,Williams(sounds like he'll be ok) and Housh you should be ok at WR.Ward does'nt have alot of value at this point but can fill in for you when needed.If Rivers is your only QB,you almost have to make this trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1st - let me assure you of Bryant's non-stud status. I just hope they don't triple team Boldin until Fitz gets back.

 

You desperately need a QB. This is a good trade for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the deal although I do think Bruce is undervalued in general.

 

With Hass and Ward, you're getting two quality players. You've got a lot of guys that are getting off to fast starts and a couple of them are probably for real, but by the end of the season, Ward and CJ will have re-established themselves as top WRs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He said he'd go Housh for Hass and Ward. Period. Seems a little tastier. But...I'd need to git rid of someone. Hmmm... :D

 

Edit to add: oh yeah, I'd throw in Rivers.

Edited by Gros Membres!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He said he'd go Housh for Hass and Ward. Period. Seems a little tastier. But...I'd need to git rid of someone. Hmmm... :D

 

Edit to add: oh yeah, I'd throw in Rivers.

 

 

I like the first deal better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too, and I'd still get rid of Rivers to free up a spot for...Alex Smith (nice playoff stretch). I like Hass alright but he never comes through in the big games. Hopefully, he'll at least be serviceable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too, and I'd still get rid of Rivers to free up a spot for...Alex Smith (nice playoff stretch). I like Hass alright but he never comes through in the big games. Hopefully, he'll at least be serviceable.

 

 

Actually, Hass usually saves his best games for December. He led me to a championship last year after being solid but not spectacular throughout most of the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hass/Ward for Bryant Johnson/I. Bruce/Rivers .

 

He is willing to do this.

 

But I think I could get Bledsoe for Bryant Johnson or Bruce. Who would you rather have the rest of the way? Hass or Bledsoe? Bledsoe has a more favorable schedule but has proven on various occassions imcapable of getting it done even against the worst of opponents. What do you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.