BASHEMGUD Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 (edited) I have Cadilac, I have been offereed Edgeren James. I have Westbrook, A Green, Taylor and Wali Lundy (Go UVA ) I though this was a no brainer and keep Cad, but James is actually having a better fantasy season in our league. What do you guys think? Thanks! Sorry for the spelling errors, very tired Edited October 25, 2006 by BASHEMGUD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikings711 Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 (edited) I have Edge, and he sucks. But, so does Caddy. Its a toss up. Edge does face a weak DEF this week, but he has a bye week the following week. At least Caddy's performance has gone up though. Edge can't run anywhere (not even against OAKs DEF!) Please see my post. Edited October 25, 2006 by vikings711 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scuba chuck Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I have Cadilac, I have been offereed Edgeren James. I have Westbrook, A Green, Taylor and Wali Lundy (Go UVA ) I though this was a no brainer and keep Cad, but James is actually having a better fantasy season in our league. What do you guys think? Thanks! Sorry for the spelling errors, very tired At first glance, Cadillac looks pretty prospective. If we avoid weeks 1 and 2, he's averaging in our league 11+ pts/week, and there's only 1 touchdown in that grouping. If I remember though, TB has one of the worst schedules this year. AZ's schedule looks slightly more promising. Although there is some current coaching problems. Perhaps you should look see how much your opponent has the **have to's** in acquiring Caddy. Perhaps up the ante a little. Otherwise, the trade looks kind of neutral. Bias' could clearly slant this one way or the other. Please respond: Trade Westbrook for Torry Holt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BASHEMGUD Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share Posted October 25, 2006 I have Edge, and he sucks. But, so does Caddy. Its a toss up. Edge does face a weak DEF this week, but he has a bye week the following week. At least Caddy's performance has gone up though. Edge can't run anywhere (not even against OAKs DEF!) Please see my post. Thanks to both of you. It does seem a toss up at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurfPimp Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I agree with the previous response. They both stink. However I would stick with Caddy. He is slowly producing more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimshady31 Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Bashemgud, Not really high on either one, but would have to say that if it were me I'd keep Caddy since he seems to be progressing. On the other hand, Edge seems to be regressing. Granted, Edge has been getting mind boggling number of carries it seems this year and still can't produce. I'm not and never was sold on Edge going to ARI and running behind that joke of an O-line down there in the desert. Edge is great RB, don't get me wrong, but it just goes to show you ain't nothing without the big fellas up front making holes for you. Even though I tend to agree these RBs are kinda a wash, I still think Caddy has more upside to run for close to 100yds per game more than Edge does. Given that, stick with Caddy and hope he stays injury free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j4mz Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Stick with the caddy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.