Sign in to follow this  
DaveNB

Commisoner Question

Recommended Posts

Can I please have some objective views if this trade is fair. It met the max objections in my nfl league. Thank you for your time.

 

Team 1

·Dunn, Warrick RB ATL

·Jackson, Darrell WR SEA

Berrian, Bernard WR CHI

 

Tean 2

·Maroney, Laurence RB NE

·Mason, Derrick WR BAL

·Roethlisberger, Ben QB PIT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On paper it doesn't look that bad. I'm not sure if Maroney is still dinged up though.

IMO, Dunn is a small upgrade over Maroney, DJax is an upgrade over Mason, and a playing QB over an injured WR (who no one know how long he will be out.

 

The team getting Dunn and DJax I think wins this one, but without knowing the rosters on both teams it's hard to shoot this one down. Is one team getting a better deal, sure every trade typically works that way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On paper it doesn't look that bad. I'm not sure if Maroney is still dinged up though.

IMO, Dunn is a small upgrade over Maroney, DJax is an upgrade over Mason, and a playing QB over an injured WR (who no one know how long he will be out.

 

The team getting Dunn and DJax I think wins this one, but without knowing the rosters on both teams it's hard to shoot this one down. Is one team getting a better deal, sure every trade typically works that way.

 

 

So you think this deal isn't that one-sided? When I looked it I compared the deal like this Dunn vs. Maroney, Dunn wins, Jackson vs. Rothelisburger Jackson wins, Berrian vs. Mason neither should be starting in a two WR league. I rejected the trade as I thought the Dunnn/Jackson team was giving up way too much. Was I really too critical?

Edited by DaveNB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree whoever is getting Dunn and DJax is getting the better deal hands down. Mason and Big Ben are both worthless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think this deal isn't that one-sided? When I looked it I compared the deal like this Dunn vs. Maroney, Dunn wins, Jackson vs. Rothelisburger Jackson wins, Berrian vs. Mason neither should be starting in a two WR league. I rejected the trade as I thought the Dunnn/Jackson team was giving up way too much. Was I really too critical?

 

 

Dave,

 

Please post both teams rosters before the trade and people can comment. Sure like I said the guy getting Dunn / DJax wins, but I can only comment on it based on the players involved.

Team 1 is getting 3 guys to play vs. 2 for Team 2 (who is getting the better of the deal), does team 1 need all three of these guys to fill a roster?

 

Personally unless you can prove collusion you should let owners manage their own teams, you don't list any extenuating circumstances (like these two owner are brothers, have already made 4 trades this year, etc.).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

appears that Team 1 made out better but I'd have to see the rest of squads to tell if it's unfair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be interested playing in your league as you as commish. If you are the one who can overturn a trade due to perception of value instead of collusion, that's wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.