pmaddock Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 Sorry, this topic may have been posted already. Since it appears that Colston is good to go, I am seriously thinking of starting both Colston and Henderson. My other options (I need to start 3 receivers) are as follows in this performance league: Colston hosting Washington Henderson hosting Washington Stallworth at the Giants or Colston or Henderson Stallworth Mark Clayton hosting Cleveland or Henderson or Colston Stallworth Mark Clayton or start both NO receivers and also Clayton. This decision is so critical. If I win, I am in the Superbowl. The really bad news is that I am going up against God (LT) and Brees (4 points awarded per TD toss, 6 points awarded per TD reception). Maybe starting both of the NO receivers will completely negate Brees (of course this could kill me if Brees throws all of his TD's toward Copper, Bush, or Duece (who I am also starting). decisions, decisions, that's why we love FF so much. I am looking forward to your replies. MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmaddock Posted December 14, 2006 Author Share Posted December 14, 2006 bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelhead Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 i am interested in this too. It's a very risky move, but with your WRs I would it. I'm starting Harrison, Colston, and Boldin. If I were to start Henderson I would bench Boldin, which against DEN that may not be a bad thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmaddock Posted December 15, 2006 Author Share Posted December 15, 2006 Steelhead, Thanks for your response. Concerning your situation, I guess you would need to know who Champ is covering - Boldin or Fitz. Anyone else out there on this forum have any more opinions on Steelhead's options or my Colston/Henderson options? PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potman Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I'm starting Bush and Colston, but hate starting 2 guys on the same offense. If you're thinking about starting 3 from the same offense you have a huge set of balls. The odds are only 1 player will blow up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustOfBeenDrunk Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 this would be my line up Colston hosting Washington Henderson hosting Washington Stallworth at the Giants my thinking is one for sure will have a big game if not both Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLGRAF Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 this would be my line up Colston hosting Washington Henderson hosting Washington Stallworth at the Giants my thinking is one for sure will have a big game if not both +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildbluefan Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Play any NO player you have...brees is that hot, and flip coin on other 2 ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarryTheRock Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Although I don't like doing it I was in a position earlier in the season where I had to start both Holt and Kevin Curtis. It worked out okay. Stallworth may be a good option as well the way Garcia is playing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mamaboy Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I have Colston and Henderson, and I am playing against Drew Brees, DO I start them both? Would it be a equalizer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLGRAF Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I have Colston and Henderson, and I am playing against Drew Brees, DO I start them both? Would it be a equalizer Start them both if you think they will produce more than your other WRs. Regardless of whom you start at WR, Brees will score the same amount of fantasy points for your opponent. So, factoring in the presence of Brees on the other team makes no sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmaddock Posted December 16, 2006 Author Share Posted December 16, 2006 Thanks for all of your replies. So far I have decided to definitely go with Colston and Henderson, along with Duece (my other options at RB, can only start 2, are Edge and TJ). Since TJ is hurt, I am starting Duece and Edge. I am also thinking of starting Mark Clayton over Stallworth. I feel that the Cleveland matchup is better than the Giants matchup. Here is my lineup for my Superbowl run: Brady (or McNair) Duece Edge Colston Henderson Clayton, Mark (or Stallworth) Crumpler Gould Bears What do you all think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc68 Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 I agree with both NO WRs, but I would start Stallworth as the third option. He seems to be back to full strength and keeps working to get open for Garcia. It seems like he is the safest start here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmaddock Posted December 16, 2006 Author Share Posted December 16, 2006 If I could a few more opinions on this Stallworth vs. Mark Clayton thing, that would be great. I am so close to changing my lineup to starting Stallworth over Clayton. What do you all think? PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonedaddies Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 Thanks for all of your replies. So far I have decided to definitely go with Colston and Henderson, along with Duece (my other options at RB, can only start 2, are Edge and TJ). Since TJ is hurt, I am starting Duece and Edge. I am also thinking of starting Mark Clayton over Stallworth. I feel that the Cleveland matchup is better than the Giants matchup. Here is my lineup for my Superbowl run: Brady (or McNair) Duece Edge Colston Henderson Clayton, Mark (or Stallworth) Crumpler Gould Bears What do you all think? WAY too many eggs in one basket, they only use one ball and the last few weeks it has been going to Bush, who BTW is not one of your three in your lineup. I would take Henderson out, with Colston back his touches will fall way off. Now he still has BIG play potential and could grab a 50+ TD, but I would look at going with your other two or looking at the wire. Is Booker picked up? What about Bryant Johnson? You are not taking his QB out, he is taking 2 of your 3 WR's out....good luck, your team looks solid and Brady is DUE for a nice game!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmaddock Posted December 16, 2006 Author Share Posted December 16, 2006 Booker was grabbed the first week before he went off. Someone must have looked into a crystal ball. Johnson was grabbed a long time ago when Fitz was out for a few weeks when he was hurt. Concerning the cancellation thing, you all are right on it not having any mathematical effect. There is just the pyschological thing, especially when I am grasping at straws trying to figure out a way to conquer LT and Brees. The eggs in the basket theory makes sense, but I definitely have to start Duece and Colston. Henderson is just one more egg in the basket. I am also worried about what happens if Colston re-injures his ankle in the course of the game. At least then I would have Henderson to fall back on, especially with Horn being out. I sure wish that I could start 4 receivers instead of just 3 receivers and 2 rb's. Drama, drama, drama, I love this game. PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe knows Superbowls Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 I'd start both N.O. WR's, their is a lot of yardage to go around in N.O. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxfactor Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 If I could a few more opinions on this Stallworth vs. Mark Clayton thing, that would be great. I am so close to changing my lineup to starting Stallworth over Clayton. What do you all think? PM I would start Stallworth over Clayton also. I'm having the problem of deciding between Stallworth and Henderson as my #3 as I have S. Smith and R. Wayne as #1-2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmaddock Posted December 17, 2006 Author Share Posted December 17, 2006 Now this decision is even more so critical. Of course my opponent not only now has LT, Brees, McGahee, Ravens against me, but he also has TO the spitter with his 18 fantasy points already against me. I need a miracle today. Henderson, Stallworth, Mark Clayton - what 2 of these 3 should I start. I will take the majority votes of this forum and go with it. PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.