Randall Posted April 23, 2007 Share Posted April 23, 2007 (edited) Never mind. I'll figure it out. Too bad I can't delete post. Edited April 24, 2007 by Randall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 No, it's not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted April 24, 2007 Author Share Posted April 24, 2007 I do want to keep Wayne, Javon, Driver and Jennings. I have Glenn and Stallworth I can trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 I have Glenn and Stallworth I can trade. Not enough IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted April 24, 2007 Author Share Posted April 24, 2007 Not enough IMO Offered both. I wasn't the one who wanted to trade so that's the best I could do. WR's always show up later so if I were him I'd wait. This year we can play more WR's so I want to keep my top 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Offered both. I wasn't the one who wanted to trade so that's the best I could do. WR's always show up later so if I were him I'd wait. This year we can play more WR's so I want to keep my top 4. You just answered your own question there, didn't you? And I'm glad that the guy didn't go for Stallworth & Glenn for Rivers. Who wants to play in a league where a trade like that is made? Yeah, you could have added Rivers for one of your other WRs, and your QB position needed help. I absolutely would have considered it. Like you said yourself, WRs always show up later... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted April 24, 2007 Author Share Posted April 24, 2007 You just answered your own question there, didn't you? And I'm glad that the guy didn't go for Stallworth & Glenn for Rivers. Who wants to play in a league where a trade like that is made? Yeah, you could have added Rivers for one of your other WRs, and your QB position needed help. I absolutely would have considered it. Like you said yourself, WRs always show up later... Yes, I did consider it, but I wasn't really interested in breaking up my team. It's a 1.5 PPR RB team(WR's get 1 and TE's get 2 pts). My QB's are Eli, Trent Green and Huard. RB's are Rudi, SJax, Rudi and Ricky Williams(if he comes back). TE's are Crumpler and Scheffler. I have the 1.05 and would probably take a QB, but if Russell goes to Oakland would probably pass. Oakland may be a death knell for QB's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 I have the 1.05 and would probably take a QB, but if Russell goes to Oakland would probably pass. Oakland may be a death knell for QB's. i think you should take Russell, great value either way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youre Going Down Posted April 26, 2007 Share Posted April 26, 2007 i think you should take Russell, great value either way I think he should take a kicker with this pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.