ajfalcone Posted June 19, 2009 Share Posted June 19, 2009 Hey guys Im starting a new Dynasty this year and contemplating starting two quarterbacks for the flex position. What are your thoughts on the pros and cons of starting two qbs. The league already boasts qbs with high points 6 points per td, 1 point every 20 yds thrown. So with this in mind top qbs will be very valuable. your thoughts thx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted June 19, 2009 Share Posted June 19, 2009 The scoring system does very little to affect QB values, but, adding QBs to the mix of the flex is one way to definitely increase their value. Take a look at the scoring by position once you get past the required starters. If the Qbs score similarly to the RBs and WRs, then it adds a legitimate option to the flex spot. If they score well above the other positions, which they most likely will, just realize that grabbing a 2nd QB early would be a primary strategy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajfalcone Posted June 19, 2009 Author Share Posted June 19, 2009 The scoring system does very little to affect QB values, but, adding QBs to the mix of the flex is one way to definitely increase their value. Take a look at the scoring by position once you get past the required starters. If the Qbs score similarly to the RBs and WRs, then it adds a legitimate option to the flex spot. If they score well above the other positions, which they most likely will, just realize that grabbing a 2nd QB early would be a primary strategy. Well looking at last years top scores on our mfl league, and my league scoring will be similar. Top 8 were qb from Brees to McNabb then two rbs, then two wrs and then it alternates between the three positions. So qbs will be the highest scoring position in my league by far. Im not sure I want to make qbs the premium position, usually prefer the rb to be king of drafts. My question is.................... people in two qb leagues. Do you like the dynamics of flexing two qbs which makes scoring higher. thx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spider321 Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 (edited) Well looking at last years top scores on our mfl league, and my league scoring will be similar. Top 8 were qb from Brees to McNabb then two rbs, then two wrs and then it alternates between the three positions. So qbs will be the highest scoring position in my league by far. Im not sure I want to make qbs the premium position, usually prefer the rb to be king of drafts. My question is.................... people in two qb leagues. Do you like the dynamics of flexing two qbs which makes scoring higher. thx Imho 2 QB leagues suck. Why decide who wins based "solely" on QB's? QB's already account for too much of the scoring in most formats. Why make it worse by adding another? Edited June 20, 2009 by spider321 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajfalcone Posted June 21, 2009 Author Share Posted June 21, 2009 Imho 2 QB leagues suck. Why decide who wins based "solely" on QB's? QB's already account for too much of the scoring in most formats. Why make it worse by adding another? True that!!! Ive decided no against two qbs. It would be too top heavy and the other positions would not almost factor in the scoring anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted June 21, 2009 Share Posted June 21, 2009 Imho 2 QB leagues suck. Why decide who wins based "solely" on QB's? QB's already account for too much of the scoring in most formats. Why make it worse by adding another? Yet they generally account for least of the value (other than kickers and most D's). Quite a quandary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.