BeeR Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 IMO: QB: 2, 3 top guys but tons of depth throughout RB: light at the top but tons of 2d and 3d tier guys WR: heavy at the top and 2d tier, then quick drop off - depth late TE: major depth throughout D, PK: who cares flip a coin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajncajn Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 RB is the position I see changing the most in depth. With so many teams going to multiple backs now, even though you still have a handful of exclusive carriers, there are a lot of serviceable players who can fill in as a flex option with a lot of upside if the primary back gets injured. What used to be wasted roster spots used to back up your stud RB now is actually becoming a viable player who can help your team regardless of the starters status. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 one thing I notice is that when there appears to be a surplus at a certain position, it ends up being the complete opposite the following year.... one year it's QB's.....the next it's RB's etc etc....the key is to try and stay ahead of the curve and draft accordingly... preferably join 20 $5000 leagues as a mock and then step it up to a couple $100,000 leagues the following year when you get a good grasp on how things are going... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Company of Heroes Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 IMO: QB: 2, 3 top guys but tons of depth throughout RB: light at the top but tons of 2d and 3d tier guys WR: heavy at the top and 2d tier, then quick drop off - depth late TE: major depth throughout D, PK: who cares flip a coin Basically agree with your assessment. Seems like lots of QBs to be had. RBs: Those few that don't share are a premium, but lots of later options. WR- yep TE: I see a couple tiers. The studs or potential studs, and then some other solid options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks21 Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 I actually think QB is quite thin. If you don't have one of the top 5 or 6, you're going to be at a pretty large disadvantage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wolf Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 one thing I notice is that when there appears to be a surplus at a certain position, it ends up being the complete opposite the following year.... one year it's QB's.....the next it's RB's etc etc....the key is to try and stay ahead of the curve and draft accordingly... preferably join 20 $5000 leagues as a mock and then step it up to a couple $100,000 leagues the following year when you get a good grasp on how things are going... Well played, sir! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wolf Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 RB, mainly due to the prevaence of the RBBC, carries more depth but fewer players at the very top who can be counted on as studs. As such, the position as a whole carries more question marks. Better to grab a couple of top WR's, the sure things, then load up on RB's, hoping that thru playing time or injuries to other RB's that someone gets a chance to stand out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.