clos11 Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Requesting feedback on draft today. I had # 2 pick. 13 rounds all together. TD - 6pts / 20yd - 1 pt (RB/WR/TE) / 50yd - 1 pt (QB) / -1pt fumble -2pt int 1. (2) Maurice Jones-Drew 2. (27) Pierre Thomas 3. (30) Marques Colston 4. (55) Donovan McNabb 5. (58) Hines Ward 6. (83) Greg Olsen 7. (86) Ray Rice 8. (111) Philadelphia 9. (114) Sammy Morris 10. (139) Muhsin Muhammad 11. (142) Nate Washington 12. (167) Joey Galloway 13. (170) Ryan Longwell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkitt80 Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Requesting feedback on draft today. I had # 2 pick. 13 rounds all together. TD - 6pts / 20yd - 1 pt (RB/WR/TE) / 50yd - 1 pt (QB) / -1pt fumble -2pt int 1. (2) Maurice Jones-Drew 2. (27) Pierre Thomas 3. (30) Marques Colston 4. (55) Donovan McNabb 5. (58) Hines Ward 6. (83) Greg Olsen 7. (86) Ray Rice 8. (111) Philadelphia 9. (114) Sammy Morris 10. (139) Muhsin Muhammad 11. (142) Nate Washington 12. (167) Joey Galloway 13. (170) Ryan Longwell Pretty good squad, although your WR seem slim. I would have went RB - WR - WR with your first 3 picks and then picked up a rb in the 4th/5th as the upside of a wr like roddy white/greg jennings, etc over your current #2 hines ward is definitely greater than the difference betweene pierre over the likes of lendale white/willie parker/etc etc just my $.02 though i give it a 7/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bree22 Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Pretty good squad, although your WR seem slim. I would have went RB - WR - WR with your first 3 picks and then picked up a rb in the 4th/5th as the upside of a wr like roddy white/greg jennings, etc over your current #2 hines ward is definitely greater than the difference betweene pierre over the likes of lendale white/willie parker/etc etc just my $.02 though i give it a 7/10 I agree I would've went WR with as your 3rd pick. RBs are a little deeper(or at least more bunched together after you get by the first 13 like the WRs), but overall for a 14 team league team looks solid and Ward is not that bad as a #2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clos11 Posted August 24, 2009 Author Share Posted August 24, 2009 I agree I would've went WR with as your 3rd pick. RBs are a little deeper(or at least more bunched together after you get by the first 13 like the WRs), but overall for a 14 team league team looks solid and Ward is not that bad as a #2. thanks. I forgot to mention that we only start 2 WR a W/T and a W/R so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 1.22 33 6666666666 u should be enshrined in the fantasy hall of fame after that draft WOW!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.