keggerz Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 (edited) Fixed your post. The only 1 required RB is a hugh factor. i dont expect him to send me 3 yrs and for what I am going to show, one year will suffice edit: i was gonna just use one of my leagues but since his QB scoring is so high I would rather use his for this exercise Edited August 25, 2009 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 i dont expect him to send me 3 yrs and for what I am going to show, one year will suffice edit: i was gonna just use one of my leagues but since his QB scoring is so high I would rather use his for this exercise Looking forward to it. You are a stats fiend after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Looking forward to it. You are a stats fiend after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt770 Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 value is better measured in comparison with other starters at the position. if 14 of the top 20 scorers are QBs, that tells me you can reasonably expect to wait until like the 8th round to draft a top 20 scorer -- at QB. assume you have 12 QB starters, 24 RB starters, 36 WR starters. what do you expect to be the difference between the #1 QB and the #12 QB? how does that compare with the difference between the top RB and the #24 RB? value is effected most by scarcity, not by scoring system. +1. This is why you should always arrange players into tiers, it makes the dropoffs obvious and compels you to make the right decisions under the gun. Usually there is less urgency to take a QB than to take a top RB or WR, regardless of the scoring. In NFL.com scoring (at least in seasons past), a ridiculously high value was placed on defenses, and usually there was a steep drop from the top 2 or 3 to the rest of the pack, so I made it a point to be the first to draft a defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notamomo Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Curious to see your results... QBS: 1. Brees, Drew QB NO 411.1 2. Rivers, Philip QB SD 354 3. Rodgers, Aaron QB GB 352.8 4. Cutler, Jay QB CHI 335 5. Warner, Kurt QB ARI 334.9 6. Manning, Peyton QB IND 313.5 7. McNabb, Donovan QB PHI 296.9 8. Cassel, Matt QB KC 292.1 9. Romo, Tony QB DAL 267.1 10. Pennington, Chad QB MIA 262.5 11. Thigpen, Tyler QB KC 250.9 12. Garrard, David QB JAC 247.2 RBs: 1. Turner, Michael RB ATL 306.7 2. Williams, DeAngelo RB CAR 304.7 3. Peterson, Adrian RB MIN 279.7 4. Forte, Matt RB CHI 248.5 5. Jones, Thomas RB NYJ 246.3 6. Slaton, Steve RB HOU 231.7 7. Tomlinson, LaDainian RB SD 230.9 8. Portis, Clinton RB WAS 223.9 9. Westbrook, Brian RB PHI 223.7 10. Jones-Drew, Maurice RB JAC 222.5 11. Johnson, Chris RB TEN 215.1 12. Jacobs, Brandon RB NYG 205.9 13. Jackson, Steven RB STL 190.7 14. Lynch, Marshawn RB BUF 190.7 15. Gore, Frank RB SF 190.1 16. Brown, Ronnie RB MIA 187.5 17. Barber, Marion RB DAL 185.5 18. White, LenDale RB TEN 175.9 19. Smith, Kevin RB DET 175.1 20. McClain, LeRon RB BAL 174.9 21. Thomas, Pierre RB NO 167.5 22. Grant, Ryan RB GB 161.3 23. Ward, Derrick RB TB 158.7 24. Stewart, Jonathan RB CAR 151.3 WRs: 1. Fitzgerald, Larry WR ARI 227.6 2. Johnson, Andre WR HOU 227 3. Johnson, Calvin WR DET 218.3 4. Jennings, Greg WR GB 195.2 5. White, Roddy WR ATL 189.8 6. Smith, Steve WR CAR 188.9 7. Bryant, Antonio WR TB 178.9 8. Owens, Terrell WR BUF 178.1 9. Boldin, Anquan WR ARI 177.8 10. Moss, Randy WR NE 176 11. Marshall, Brandon WR DEN 164.9 12. Wayne, Reggie WR IND 163.8 13. Jackson, Vincent WR SD 163.2 14. Berrian, Bernard WR MIN 163.1 15. Moore, Lance WR NO 163 16. Moss, Santana WR WAS 157.1 17. Ward, Hines WR PIT 155.2 18. Bowe, Dwayne WR KC 152 19. Walter, Kevin WR HOU 150.7 20. Royal, Eddie WR DEN 148.5 21. Welker, Wes WR NE 143.3 22. Driver, Donald WR GB 143 23. Mason, Derrick WR BAL 141.6 24. Coles, Laveranues WR CIN 136 25. Bruce, Isaac WR SF 133.7 26. Evans, Lee WR BUF 132.9 27. Muhammad, Muhsin WR CAR 129.4 28. Breaston, Steve WR ARI 126.4 29. Cotchery, Jerricho WR NYJ 126 30. Jackson, DeSean WR PHI 125.1 31. Houshmandzadeh, T.J. WR SEA 122.8 32. Clayton, Mark WR BAL 119.2 33. Holmes, Santonio WR PIT 118.8 34. Ginn Jr., Ted WR MIA 117.8 35. Edwards, Braylon WR CLE 117.6 36. Colston, Marques WR NO 116.4 TEs: 1. Gonzalez, Tony TE ATL 174.8 2. Witten, Jason TE DAL 128.4 3. Clark, Dallas TE IND 128 4. Gates, Antonio TE SD 125.6 5. Shiancoe, Visanthe TE MIN 110.4 6. Daniels, Owen TE HOU 104 7. Carlson, John TE SEA 101.6 8. Cooley, Chris TE WAS 96 9. Fasano, Anthony TE MIA 96 10. Miller, Zach TE OAK 94 11. Olsen, Greg TE CHI 91.2 12. Scheffler, Tony TE DEN 88.5 Ks: 1. Gostkowski, Stephen K NE 166.5 2. Akers, David K PHI 162.5 3. Carney, John K NO 158.5 4. Bironas, Rob K TEN 153.5 5. Longwell, Ryan K MIN 153.5 6. Kasay, John K CAR 152.5 7. Elam, Jason K ATL 149.5 8. Crosby, Mason K GB 146.5 9. Bryant, Matt K TB 145.5 10. Brown, Kris K HOU 144.5 11. Brown, Josh K STL 143.5 12. Lindell, Rian K BUF 143.5 DST: 1. Steelers DST 323 2. Eagles DST 280 3. Ravens DST 275 4. Titans DST 262 5. Vikings DST 259 6. Giants DST 245 7. Buccaneers DST 231 8. Cowboys DST 215 9. Dolphins DST 213 10. Colts DST 203 11. Packers DST 203 12. Jets 203 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadgerBacker Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 As noted by others earlier, it's not the level of scoring that matters as much as the drop off to the marginal starter. In most systems, that usually favors the RB over the QB. The exception would be if it was a flex league where QB was flex eligible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pillsbury Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 Big John and BB bring up a point in another thread that makes me wonder. The top 9 scorers from last year in one league I am in are QBs. 14 out of the top 20... QBs. The top RB ranked 10th and the top WR ranked 44th. So my league scoring tells me that a QB in the first round isn't all that out of line. Is that off the wall thinking? Should I ignore that and go with RBs anyway? Wonder what league you're talking about Sky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skylive5 Posted August 27, 2009 Author Share Posted August 27, 2009 Wonder what league you're talking about Sky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.