Ursa Majoris Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Hmmm? 1. I detailed a legitimate Constitutional question as to the meaning of "natural born citizen." That is hardly a conspiracy. That's something the Supreme Court needs to clarify. And, it's not going away. If the press was doing its job, you would know that there are many bills in state legislatures requiring the various Secretaries of State to demand proof of eligibility for office in order to be on the ballot. 2. Wrong again. I merely reported that it was being discussed. The fact that it is being discussed should be of concern - apparently not you. You would rather attack me. 3. You act as if I coined the term, "Climategate," Virtually unreported by the American press, thousands of emails were hacked from the East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, talking about suppression of data, prevention of opposite views being published, etc. You can Google it. Seriously. Do you ever read any of the posts opposing you? The answer is surely No because pretty much everything you've said has been rebutted c/w references and reasoned argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 there is pretty decisive proof there were year-round settlements with livestock, agriculture, etc. during the medieval period, that then died out as temperatures cooled significantly leading into the "little ice age". for that to be possible, it had to be warmer there than it is now. this is established in historical and archaelogical records, as well as the temperature records. I'm not disagreeing with that, for the most part. Can you tell me what percentage of the island was this lush farmland then? And how that percentage relates to the current state of the island? Awaiting your answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady.hawke Posted December 2, 2009 Author Share Posted December 2, 2009 (edited) Do you ever read any of the posts opposing you? The answer is surely No because pretty much everything you've said has been rebutted c/w references and reasoned argument. You consider that a legitimate answer? Nothing I have said has been factually rebutted. I have read every post. How about you state a fact and not just pretend that they exist? Just because you are popular here does not make everything you say true. Edited December 2, 2009 by Lady.hawke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 You consider that a legitimate answer? Nothing I have said has been factually rebutted. I have read every post. How about you state a fact and not just pretend that they exist? Just because you are popular here does not make everything you say true. I would hardly count myself as popular but I'm also not going top laboriously re-type out all the posts wiegie, BW, me and others have set forth again. Frankly, there seems little point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady.hawke Posted December 2, 2009 Author Share Posted December 2, 2009 I would hardly count myself as popular but I'm also not going top laboriously re-type out all the posts wiegie, BW, me and others have set forth again. Frankly, there seems little point. Another non-answer to a direct challenge. I am pretty sure I won the debate with wiegie. Read the transcript. If you are going to accuse me directly of something, please do so. If not, please stop with that nonsensical innuendo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Cid Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 the real question is can we wait to find out those questions you are asking. Will waiting be a good thingy or a bad thingy. do you really think our way of life, economy and cultural heritage will be destroyed if we try to not pollute so much? that is like saying obama will take all the guns when he is elected. Holy crap! He spelled every word correctly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Holy crap! He spelled every word correctly! He made up for that in capitalization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 There are actually more trees today than there was 100 years ago. The logging industry plants 3 for every one they cut down. Also younger growing trees scrub more CO2 than older ones. You might also look at the BBC report that stated the warmer temperatures are allowing forest expand in regions that haven't seen trees since the last interglacial period. there are more trees here in the U.S. but not elsewhere. but who gives a shat about elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Another non-answer to a direct challenge. I am pretty sure I won the debate with wiegie. Read the transcript. If you are going to accuse me directly of something, please do so. If not, please stop with that nonsensical innuendo. Visit My Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 CFCs were banned in aerosols and fridges. Why? Because changes were noticeable. Were you asleep? when were they banned ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 It's not what has happened in the last 5 years relative to the past 15-20 years. It's what has happened in the past 100 years relative to the past 400K:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...xide_400kyr.png Everyone knows the answers to these largely irrelevant questions. Thanks as this was the info i was looking for and getting to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimC Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 We should tackle this like the moon project. The better by-product than saving the environment for the hippies is getting us completely off oil and drying up the source of income for those Middle Eastern terrorist religious fanatics and not depending on foreign countries that want to kill us for our energy needs. This should be the angle the hippies should be using instead of some Arctic ice sheet BS, if they want to get the average middle American on their side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 The global temperature has risen since the moment Chuck Norris was born. Coincidence? I think not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Irish Doggy Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 when were they banned ? Really? You don't know? Google hole in the ozone layer. Its over the south pole and bigger than Antarctica. CFCs were the direct cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 its cold out today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 its cold out today then move south you will fit in much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimC Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 then move south you will fit in much better. too many yankees down here already. i have to stop them burning my house down at least once a month. disgusting little f'ers they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 then move south you will fit in much better. He is by Chicago, which is the south by your definition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 then move south you will fit in much better. It's snowing in Dallas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westvirginia Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 It's snowing in Dallas It's supposed to snow later this week here too. I blame the terrorists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 It's supposed to snow later this week here too. I blame the terrorists. Even I know not everything is Obama's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 when were they banned ? Sept 16, 1987 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Sept 16, 1987 a sad day. timc's hair has never looked the same since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 a sad day. timc's hair has never looked the same since. As in the balding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billay Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 also, if you are interested in the facts behind the rod blagojevich scandal, I suggest you listen to objective assessment. Your representation of the program is far more disingenuous than mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts