CaP'N GRuNGe Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 10-0 Redskins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Champ is Here Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Brees has never won in a cold weather game... Skins +10 looking really good, plus the under will hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loaf Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 I'd say yes if there weren't 3 other quarters to go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted December 6, 2009 Author Share Posted December 6, 2009 Just like that we're tied. Thanks Colston. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pig devilz Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 17-10.....bad feeling about Saints all week Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
efi4eye Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 I'm not worried about em... Saints have come from behind more than once this year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted December 6, 2009 Author Share Posted December 6, 2009 The Vikings wouldn't mind if the Saints dropped this game... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 This should be interesting to watch on the highlight shows later: Â Last Play: 3-26-WAS 44(:43) (Shotgun) D.Brees pass short middle intended for J.Shockey INTERCEPTED by K.Moore (K.Moore) at WAS 30. K.Moore to WAS 44 for 14 yards (R.Meachem). FUMBLES (R.Meachem), RECOVERED by NO-R.Meachem at WAS 44. R.Meachem for 44 yards, TOUCHDOWN. ... Play Under Review. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbpfan1231 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 you can't overturn this!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42zero Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 This would be so sweet if the saints lost to the redskins. Lets hope the skins can keep it up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 (edited) This should be interesting to watch on the highlight shows later:Â Last Play: 3-26-WAS 44(:43) (Shotgun) D.Brees pass short middle intended for J.Shockey INTERCEPTED by K.Moore (K.Moore) at WAS 30. K.Moore to WAS 44 for 14 yards (R.Meachem). FUMBLES (R.Meachem), RECOVERED by NO-R.Meachem at WAS 44. R.Meachem for 44 yards, TOUCHDOWN. ... Play Under Review. Just saw this on Redzone. I think it stands. Â ETA: Maybe not. Could be down by contact on the INT. Edited December 6, 2009 by Ursa Majoris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 This should be interesting to watch on the highlight shows later:Â Last Play: 3-26-WAS 44(:43) (Shotgun) D.Brees pass short middle intended for J.Shockey INTERCEPTED by K.Moore (K.Moore) at WAS 30. K.Moore to WAS 44 for 14 yards (R.Meachem). FUMBLES (R.Meachem), RECOVERED by NO-R.Meachem at WAS 44. R.Meachem for 44 yards, TOUCHDOWN. ... Play Under Review. Â That's a total "I hope we don't crap out this horseshoe" play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myhousekey Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Wow, play stands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Wow, play stands. I think that's a good call and for damn sure it's a good omen for the Saints Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamikaze_sensei Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Meachem just proved why you never give up on a play. I still can't believe what I just saw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted December 6, 2009 Author Share Posted December 6, 2009 I just got a defensive TD for that play for the Saints DT. Help me out, I can't remember. Is that how it's usually scored? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thews40 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Meachem just proved why you never give up on a play. I still can't believe what I just saw. So is this scored as a defensive TD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSA81 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shouldn't my Saints D get the pionts! Â Gott'em in one league but not the other.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Let me just cut off the 800 "Why did the Saints DST get a TD on that play " threads. Possesion went to Wash on the int. When Meachem recovered the fumble he is eesentially a D player. Saints DST should get a TD for that play Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Meachem just proved why you never give up on a play. I still can't believe what I just saw.   I just got a defensive TD for that play for the Saints DT. Help me out, I can't remember. Is that how it's usually scored?   Shouldn't my Saints D get the pionts!  Gott'em in one league but not the other....   Let me just cut off the 800 "Why did the Saints DST get a TD on that play " threads. Possesion went to Wash on the int. When Meachem recovered the fumble he is eesentially a D player. Saints DST should get a TD for that play   I swear I didnt see these while I was typing my post..It started already Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSA81 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Shouldn't my Saints D get the pionts! Â Gott'em in one league but not the other.... Â Â nvm they just decided to put'em up for me. Â seemed like it took forever for some reason.... Â I'm very impatient Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42zero Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 This is the type of lucky crap that happens to the saints when they r loosing. Sooner or later their luck will run out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted December 6, 2009 Author Share Posted December 6, 2009 Let me just cut off the 800 "Why did the Saints DST get a TD on that play " threads. Possesion went to Wash on the int. When Meachem recovered the fumble he is eesentially a D player. Saints DST should get a TD for that play  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 I just got a defensive TD for that play for the Saints DT. Help me out, I can't remember. Is that how it's usually scored? Â http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?show...=310675&hl= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Let me just cut off the 800 "Why did the Saints DST get a TD on that play " threads. Possesion went to Wash on the int. When Meachem recovered the fumble he is eesentially a D player. Saints DST should get a TD for that play Nope. It's an offensive fumble recovery TD. It should not go to the D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.