Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 I gotta say, the games this weekend have been the best I've seen in a very long time. true dat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Why call timeout with 13 seconds? He absolutely panicked in front of his team, his owner, and his fans. Let the clock run to 2 seconds, kick the FG, game over. Instead, with time on the clock, Seattle gets two plays to either get in FG range, or a shot at a Hail Mary. He's a disgrace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loaf Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 I was sweating that one out. WTG Falcons! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolverines Fan Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 This weekend's games have not disappointed..... +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Muto Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Maybe you call with with 13 seconds left in case of a penalty on a made FG. If there is no time left on the clock and there is a penalty on a made FG you don't get a chance to kick it again. They should have ran it down to 6-7 seconds though as no FG attempt can take more than 5 seconds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolverines Fan Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 He absolutely panicked in front of his team, his owner, and his fans. Let the clock run to 2 seconds, kick the FG, game over. Instead, with time on the clock, Seattle gets two plays to either get in FG range, or a shot at a Hail Mary. He's a disgrace. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted January 13, 2013 Author Share Posted January 13, 2013 Maybe you call with with 13 seconds left in case of a penalty on a made FG. If there is no time left on the clock and there is a penalty on a made FG you don't get a chance to kick it again. They should have ran it down to 6-7 seconds though as no FG attempt can take more than 5 seconds. I believe there is a 10 second runoff....not sure what the parameters of the 10 second runoff are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Muto Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 I believe the 10 second run off only occurs when the clock was running and since they called a timeout before that play if there is an offensive penalty there would not be a 10 second run off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcmast Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Maybe you call with with 13 seconds left in case of a penalty on a made FG. If there is no time left on the clock and there is a penalty on a made FG you don't get a chance to kick it again. They should have ran it down to 6-7 seconds though as no FG attempt can take more than 5 seconds. Seriously? That makes no sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 He absolutely panicked in front of his team, his owner, and his fans. Let the clock run to 2 seconds, kick the FG, game over. Instead, with time on the clock, Seattle gets two plays to either get in FG range, or a shot at a Hail Mary. He's a disgrace. Disgrace may be a bit much. He was probably channeling Andy Reid. Or he forgot they had slready used their 3rd timeout snd was planning on one more play Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Muto Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Seriously? That makes no sense. Have you guys not seen teams call timeouts with 6 and 7 seconds left many times in games ? I have seen it so many times in case their is a bad snap or a penatly because if the clock hits 0 you don't get a second chance. It makes tons of sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcmast Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 (edited) Have you guys not seen teams call timeouts with 6 and 7 seconds left many times in games ? I have seen it so many times in case their is a bad snap or a penatly because if the clock hits 0 you don't get a second chance. It makes tons of sense. Bad snap, yes. Penalty, no I've never heard that mentioned. Found it. I thought it defense accepted a penalty the game wouldn't end, but I stand corrected. Edited January 13, 2013 by kcmast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 (edited) I think he was thinking about running another play. Perhaps a quick out to the sideline. But wisely decided against it. After all, it was a 50 yarder. I don't mind the time out there. Edited January 13, 2013 by CaptainHook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted January 13, 2013 Author Share Posted January 13, 2013 So Peyton passed over both Seattle and San Fransisco last year in favor of Denver. Think either of those teams wishes they had Peyton now? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 So Peyton passed over both Seattle and San Fransisco last year in favor of Denver. Think either of those teams wishes they had Peyton now? I'll answer that one for you...NO 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsosi Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 So Peyton passed over both Seattle and San Fransisco last year in favor of Denver. Think either of those teams wishes they had Peyton now? Didn't Arizona really want him badly? Safe to say they still do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Have you guys not seen teams call timeouts with 6 and 7 seconds left many times in games ? I have seen it so many times in case their is a bad snap or a penatly because if the clock hits 0 you don't get a second chance. It makes tons of sense. What difference would it have made if, with 7 seconds on the clock, there was a bad snap? Are you saying they could have lined-up again, re-snapped the ball, and kicked it...all within 7 seconds? Further if there was a penalty (say, a false start)...what difference does it make if it happens with 13 seconds versus 2? Instead of a 48 yard FG, it would be a 53 yarder....still within Bryants range, so the point is moot. You can try to defend him, but in his presser afterwards, he admitted there was some confusion with the way the whole last 13 seconds went down. Uh, yeah...you can say that again, dipweed. Jeez Henry....you smoking some $100K crack? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theprofessor Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 There is no way Pete Carroll would rather have Peyton Manning over Russell Wilson. Russell is on his way to 10+ years of success in the NFL. Peyton is a first ballot HOF inductee, with maybr 2 years left. Russell will have more SB rings than Peyton by the end of his career. This kid is special. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theprofessor Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 So Peyton passed over both Seattle and San Fransisco last year in favor of Denver. Think either of those teams wishes they had Peyton now? A big, resounding, No! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joebirds55 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 There is no way Pete Carroll would rather have Peyton Manning over Russell Wilson. Russell is on his way to 10+ years of success in the NFL. Peyton is a first ballot HOF inductee, with maybr 2 years left. Russell will have more SB rings than Peyton by the end of his career. This kid is special. Pretty bold essentially calling the guy a hall of famer after one good season. I agree of course I'd take Wilson due to age alone, but jeez how many good qbs don't win a Super Bowl, or struggle to even win 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Pretty bold essentially calling the guy a hall of famer after one good season. I agree of course I'd take Wilson due to age alone, but jeez how many good qbs don't win a Super Bowl, or struggle to even win 1 Exactly, he is good and special, but saying he'll win at least 2 Super Bowls is going way out on a limb, or being a total homer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.