Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Thinking of benching Cruz for Cordarrelle Patterson. Would you?


wpayers
 Share

Recommended Posts

Entering the semi-finals and my weakest link is Cruz. He's ice cold and has SEA coming up. I am an advocate of never bench your studs but Cruz has lost his studliness.

 

Patterson is available on the WW, is finally living up to his potential and is riding a nice streak. But can he be trusted???

 

Would you bench Cruz for Patterson? I also have Crabtree sitting on the bench but don't see him back to 100%.

Edited by wpayers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking at Patterson myself and the one thing I've been watching is the status of Peterson for this game. If Peterson can't go Patterson may not see as much daylight as he has been.

 

Fair point. But if Peterson is out the Vikes may push the passing game and feature Patterson. TobyG is no AP so the run game will be so-so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both Crabtree and Cruz and Im going with Cruz at WR3...He plays better at home and Giants are going to have to be throwing...

 

Your are right...but lately more throwing for ELI has meant more picks. I am still on the fence. So far, its Cruz by a nose over Patterson with Crabtree fading fast.

 

More thoughts???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair point. But if Peterson is out the Vikes may push the passing game and feature Patterson. TobyG is no AP so the run game will be so-so.

 

 

Which is why Patterson would see more coverage his way as the defense doesn't need to focus on the run like it would with Peterson in there, even a healthy Gerhardt would make the D respect the run. The Vikes can push the passing game all they want, if they have no run game the defense respects they will focus on shutting down the pass because the run game isn't hurting them. Being a rookie he doesn't have the skills/experience to break double teams yet.

 

Having said that, Philly is still 30-31st against the pass and Vikes are at home. Plus, Cassel can still throw it and targeted him 7 times against a better pass D than the Eagles. The Vikes seem to be game planning a bit more to get him the ball. Imo Patterson emerging as he seems to be, at home against a 30th ranked pass D is preferable to Cruz against a #1 pass d with the putrid Eli throwing to him. Good luck with whatever you decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in a similar situation. I need to bench one of these WRs:

 

Patterson, Cordarrelle...PHI

Hilton, T.Y......................HOU

Cruz, Victor....................SEA

Douglas, Harry...............WAS

 

Its a sorry looking group but I lost Cobb and Julio Jones and have been lucky to stay afloat in my league. I didn't think I would have much of a chance in the playoffs but my opponent started Peyton Manning, Knowshon Moreno, and Eric Decker last night leaving me an outside shot. Before last nights game I was leaning towards Patterson because I don't see AP playing and with Gehrart hurting I think the Vikings will throw a lot. The thing that worries me most about Cordelle is with no threat of a running game the Eagles will probably play two deep safeties and I'm not sure he gets the big play he needs. Cruz has a tough matchup but I still think he is the safer start. Bottom line for me is Patterson is a bigger risk but with more upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in a similar situation. I need to bench one of these WRs:

 

Patterson, Cordarrelle...PHI

Hilton, T.Y......................HOU

Cruz, Victor....................SEA

Douglas, Harry...............WAS

 

Its a sorry looking group but I lost Cobb and Julio Jones and have been lucky to stay afloat in my league. I didn't think I would have much of a chance in the playoffs but my opponent started Peyton Manning, Knowshon Moreno, and Eric Decker last night leaving me an outside shot. Before last nights game I was leaning towards Patterson because I don't see AP playing and with Gehrart hurting I think the Vikings will throw a lot. The thing that worries me most about Cordelle is with no threat of a running game the Eagles will probably play two deep safeties and I'm not sure he gets the big play he needs. Cruz has a tough matchup but I still think he is the safer start. Bottom line for me is Patterson is a bigger risk but with more upside.

 

Thanks for insight. Out of that group you can't bench Douglas and TY. So it comes down to my same situation. Interestingly, my opponent also had Decker and Moreno last night and I got by only being down 8pts. The other team is still loaded so I need upside...thus I am leaning to Patterson over Cruz. Also, this just in on the Vikes running game:

 

http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/279210/vikes-list-peterson--and--gerhart-as-questionable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information