PurePlaya Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 There is a trade that has been presented, and a veto has been called for and I have to vote. I hate vetoing trades. The league is a high scoring PPR with bonuses. 6pt TDs, +10 bonus for 100 yards, and every 100 after for rushing and receiving. The team getting Gurley, if they get him, will have Hill, Mahomes, Gurley, Kamara. Let me know what everyone thinks: MSGB trades Todd Gurley II, LAR RBJosh Reynolds, LAR WRJosh Adams, Phi RBMarcus Mariota, Ten QB CAVA trades James Conner, Pit RBJames White, NE RBMarquez Valdes-Scantling, GB WRJaylen Samuels, Pit RB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purplemonster Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 (edited) Seems slightly weak for the guy trading away Gurley, but it's not absurd. I am assuming the issue is that CAVA has a much better record. Edited November 21, 2018 by purplemonster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurePlaya Posted November 21, 2018 Author Share Posted November 21, 2018 Hate bumping my own thread, but anyone have an opinion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tlmisnotthebest Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 Outside of last week Conner has been on fire and White has been gold in ppr. I get that Gurley is an elite player but i don't think it's veto worthy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purplemonster Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 (edited) I don't know that there's enough there to veto, Conner is a RB1, White is a solid RB2. And with PPR White is pretty good. It does cast a bit of a pall when a guy adds Gurley to that roster, but that isn't a reason to veto, unless there's collusion Edited November 21, 2018 by purplemonster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurePlaya Posted November 21, 2018 Author Share Posted November 21, 2018 The team getting Gurley has the best record in the league, Gurley for Connor and White, I think the rest is fluff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purplemonster Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, PurePlaya said: The team getting Gurley has the best record in the league, Gurley for Connor and White, I think the rest is fluff. If there's any consolation, I am not sure how I feel about Gurley ROS, I think it will be slightly or somewhat less than previous production. You can tell that McVay is pretty protective of Gurley and wants a SB bad this year, so will do whatever he can to keep him healthy. Edited November 21, 2018 by purplemonster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tlmisnotthebest Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 Gurley for Conner and White doesn't seem to me extremely lopsided, i wouldn't veto that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurePlaya Posted November 21, 2018 Author Share Posted November 21, 2018 Thanks all, not going to Veto it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance44 Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 Gurley is great but I don’t seem where there is enough to veto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amit87 Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 Ya i don't think it's veto-worthy. Every trade will have a winner and loser, but this isn't crazy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaft Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 No need to veto this trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerlane Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 Not veto worthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rugbynoodles Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 Agree on the don't veto, I don't like vetoing trades unless there is collusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrRed Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 Veto. That guy is winning the league either way tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
char92474 Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 Don't see how you can veto this trade. One team is giving up 2 really good players to get a great player. Vetos should only be used for collusion and I don't see how you can say this is collusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8rattoon Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 2 hours ago, DrRed said: Veto. That guy is winning the league either way tho. Irrelevant. The trade is what matters; it looks very fair to me. As an aside, I think Gurley is gonna be a huge fade during the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Properson Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 Looks fair but damn, a 4 for 4 is always eyebrow raised worthy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana is da Man Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 no need to veto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outfit Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 I'd let it go through Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.