Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Need a laugh? Check out my week 1 results...and help, please!


A.J.
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm trying not to over-react after one week, but am at a loss with this team.  Goose eggs for three of my starters (I know Sutton's currently playing, but not looking good).  It's a deep 14-player PPR league, but this year we lowered bench spots to 4 in the hopes of getting some good waiver pick-ups.  Should I make any drops?  Who to target on waiver with good season potential?  Really at a loss here.  Thanks for any help!

9E0C4773-3317-4C20-9731-A7DFA4705A42_1_201_a.jpeg

3B439F25-C9D6-4CFA-AABA-9954251457F4_1_201_a.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also have Akers, he was one of my 5 keepers and expected to be a starter at RB. But I went with Jacobs and Conner instead, and lucked out. I sure hope the Rams play better going forward, and Akers is more involved in the game plan. You had 2 productive RBs on your bench, so I wouldn't panic too much at that position. 

Kmet was my starting TE and very disappointed with no production, he had one target, but then it was a sloppy game with limited passing.

I think Hill may be a good play at TE, and am considering adding him myself. But I also have Michael Thomas and not sure I'd want to be using both of them on a regular basis (Thomas was on the bench behind Adams, Pittman & Jeudy but will get consideration as a starter going forward.)

By the way, your bench is very short, I know ours is long (we also start 9, with a 3rd WR no flex) with 9 spots but 4 seems very short. How can you even cover bye weeks without dropping all your depth. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, stevegrab said:

I also have Akers, he was one of my 5 keepers and expected to be a starter at RB. But I went with Jacobs and Conner instead, and lucked out. I sure hope the Rams play better going forward, and Akers is more involved in the game plan. You had 2 productive RBs on your bench, so I wouldn't panic too much at that position. 

Kmet was my starting TE and very disappointed with no production, he had one target, but then it was a sloppy game with limited passing.

I think Hill may be a good play at TE, and am considering adding him myself. But I also have Michael Thomas and not sure I'd want to be using both of them on a regular basis (Thomas was on the bench behind Adams, Pittman & Jeudy but will get consideration as a starter going forward.)

By the way, your bench is very short, I know ours is long (we also start 9, with a 3rd WR no flex) with 9 spots but 4 seems very short. How can you even cover bye weeks without dropping all your depth. 

Thanks!  This is our third year with this same 14-player league.  This year the bench spots were lowered to four because the waiver wire was really bleak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, A.J. said:

Thanks!  This is our third year with this same 14-player league.  This year the bench spots were lowered to four because the waiver wire was really bleak.

Part of that is having 14 teams, the more teams the less depth. Your max players rostered (if everybody is using their IR slot) is 196, ours (with 9 starters and 9 bench for 12 teams) is 216, just 20 more players. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Finn5033 said:

You’re fine. Bench Akers and move Dillon into his spot. Bench Lamb for now and move Sutton to his spot. And put Carter in your flex. 
 

might be worth it to drop Guage and pick up Julio

This is good advice and making these starter/bench moves are spot on.  As for Julio, I agree he's a worthwhile target if Godwin is out for extended time, as I'd trust that he'll see more action than Gage.  You could target one of the other WRs on the waiver wire like Duvernay or Samuel, but I think they come with more risk than Julio.  I'd also consider Robby Anderson (go figure!) and Chark.  If you really want to go RB, the Burkhead seems the obvious choice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information