dopple Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 Relatively standard scoring league for RBs. 1 pt / 10 yards rushing, 1 pt / 10 yards receiving, 1 pt / catch, 6 pt / TD, -2 Fumbles. I start 2 RBs and then 1 RB / WR flex, which for several weeks I've used an RB. So I have to choose 3 of the following RBs: A Green (vs Det) C Dillon (vs Cin) J Jones (vs NO) L Johnson (vs Ten) D Blaylock (vs Ten) M Williams (vs Sea) I also have Davenport and Falk, to handcuff Green and Dillon. Right now I'm starting Green, Dillon, and Jones. Green and Dillon have been my main guys all year (I'm 12-1 and in first right now) and Jones is hot right now facing a poor NO run D. Moe is my old "emergency back" for bye weeks and I wouldn't start him, obviously. Johnson looks like he'll get more work as KC tries to see if he can replace Priest, and Blaylock usually puts up good numbers too. Should I bench Green or Dillon to start one of the KC guys? Will NE use Dillon sparingly to avoid pre-playoof injuries? Green's injuries have bothered me but he puts up great numbers when healthy. Help! Will answer yours if you leave a link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 Green, Dillon and Jones. Should be an easy choice. The remainder of your RBs are in RBBC situations. If KC named either Blaylock or Johnson the FEATURE back (not just the "starter"), then perhaps you rethink it a bit. Even if they did, however, I don't think I'd start LJ or Blaylock over Jones, Green or Dillon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dopple Posted December 8, 2004 Author Share Posted December 8, 2004 Green, Dillon and Jones. Should be an easy choice. The remainder of your RBs are in RBBC situations. If KC named either Blaylock or Johnson the FEATURE back (not just the "starter"), then perhaps you rethink it a bit. Even if they did, however, I don't think I'd start LJ or Blaylock over Jones, Green or Dillon. 600192[/snapback] Except that Green has been on - off injured lately...put up 8 pts last wee to Blaylock's 16 and LJ's 33 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 Except that Green has been on - off injured lately...put up 8 pts last wee to Blaylock's 16 and LJ's 33 600222[/snapback] And it was Green's first game back after injury and the Eagles were up by like 91385018591835 in the first half. If you're so sure LJ or Blaylock are better starts, choose one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadCoInLa Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 Darin hit the nail on the head. Green and Dillon are studs and you know what they say about studs (lol). Jones is a stud in the making ... he will tear up the Aints Def. Johnson is tempting, but the RRBC with Blaylock puts both on the pine. Williams doesn't look better than your top three, so he rides the pine as well. Here's my link: http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?showtopic=78885 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dopple Posted December 8, 2004 Author Share Posted December 8, 2004 And it was Green's first game back after injury and the Eagles were up by like 91385018591835 in the first half. If you're so sure LJ or Blaylock are better starts, choose one. 600225[/snapback] lol no offense meant, obviously i'm not sure. just playing devil's advocate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHC3 Posted December 9, 2004 Share Posted December 9, 2004 You have to stay with Green, Dillion and Jones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.