WaterMan Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 I'm playing Harrison against Peyton. I was going to start Harrison no matter what anyways, but if Peyton throws TDs only to Harrison, then Harrison will end up with more points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 god help us all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 I'm playing Harrison against Peyton. I was going to start Harrison no matter what anyways, but if Peyton throws TDs only to Harrison, then Harrison will end up with more points. 1067250[/snapback] 2 receptions for 17 yards last week diappointing if you ask me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted October 16, 2005 Author Share Posted October 16, 2005 As a f*cking a$$jack that drafted Gardner in two leagues on a hunch, let me tell you something, leave the spot empty, you'll score more than starting that hack. 1067070[/snapback] I had to clean my keyboard off after that one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted October 16, 2005 Author Share Posted October 16, 2005 I always start the player that I think will score the most points based on a number of factors including who is playing who. However... I use the cancell theory when looking at my #3 WR if there are two guys with equal match-ups who I like equally well. I draft RBs early and barring injury I usually match-up very well with the other 11 team's RBs. I draft QBs late and draft a ton of WRs as, to me, it is the most difficult fantasy position to play. Short version, anything I can get out of my #3 WR on a weekly basis is pretty much gravy. If there are two players I'm wavering on in a given week at that spot and all things are equal I use this theory. I use this theory a lot when I think your QB will outscore mine given the above perameters. In one of my leagues I will generally be starting Walker, Bruce and Mason as my #3. If you are playing Culpepper and I'm trying to decide between Mason and Williamson, all things being equal between Mason and Williamson that week, I'll start Williamson. Of course I truly believe that a parachute opening properly when you skydive is a 50-50 proposition not matter what you geniuses think. 961169[/snapback] BTW ... the fact that CFH, who has never won a championship, subscribes to this theory is all the validation AGAINST the theory I need Hey CFH how you doing in your leagues this year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Should I play Mike Anderson to cancel out my opponent playing Bell? What about team chemistry? Should I sit TO because he doesn't get along well with Barlow? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 (edited) I am not sure if I should start another topic, and this is off this topic since I already replied and just curious how anyone works this. Do you pick up a free agent just so someone else can't pick them even if there isn't a chance they will start. Example, I have D Davis, Edge, and Pittman, and picked up J Jones just so another team weak at RB couldn't pick them up. There was a cost for the transaction and since he will never play does this make sense? 622868[/snapback] If I sit Holt does that mean Bulger will have a bad game? Edited October 16, 2005 by Randall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 2 receptions for 17 yards last week diappointing if you ask me. 1067450[/snapback] No shucks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.