sunysteelfly76 Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 (edited) I only did the QB's who were in at least three SB's 1.Joe Montana (4-0) 83/122 1142-yds 11-td 0-int 127.8 rating 2.Troy Aikman (3-0) 56/80 689-yds 5-td 1-int 111.9 rating 3.Terry Bradshaw (4-0) 49/84 842-yds 8-td 4-int 104.3 rating4.Tom Brady (3-0) 71/108 735-yds 6-td 1-int 99.9 rating5.Roger Staubach (2-2) 61/99 734-yds 8-td 4-int 94.4 rating6.John Elway (2-2) 76/152 1128-yds 3-td 8-int 59.3 rating7.Jim Kelly (0-4) 81/145 829-yds 2-td 7-int 56.9 rating8.Fran Tarkenton(0-3) 46/89 489-yds 1-td 6-int 43.7 rating Edited February 7, 2005 by sunysteelfly76 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Plane Out Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 WOW! Montana throws 122 passes in 4 SBs and no INTs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat Face Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 what about Jim Kelley? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 Elway was 2-3 in SBs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 so.... montana avg'd about 30 pa/game aikman 26 bradshaw 21 elway 25 kelly 36 tark 30 when den played gb: td had 30 rushes for 157; elway was 12/22 for 123 when denver played atl: td was 25/102; elway was 18/29 for 336 kelly was forced to throw due to being down so often too. min vs miami: min's offense couldn't do much. min vs pit: again up against an awesome d... min vs oak: tark was 17/35 for only 205 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 (edited) sf vs cin: of 63 plays, 40 were rushes. 14/22 for 157 sf vs mia: of 76 plays 40 were rushes 24/35 for 331 sf vs cin: of 67 plays 27 were rushes 23/36 for 357 sf vs den: of 77 plays 44 were rushes 22/29 for 297 no 100 yard rushers in the sb's, though vs mia he had 2 50+ yd rushers. Edited February 6, 2005 by Bier Meister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 The Elway #s are wrong: 86 vs NY - 22-37-304, 1 td, 1 int 87 vs Was - 14-38-257, 1, 3 89 vs SF - 10-26-108, 2 ints 97 vs GB - 12-22-123, 1 int 98 vs Atl - 18-29-336, 1 td, 1 int Totals: 76-152, 1128, 3 tds, 8 ints. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 Elways cumulative SB rating is 58.01. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 elway's first three and kelly's four, just unfortunate that the afc couldn't match up with the NFC (yes there were a few close games in there, but the NFC was the elite) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 Oh, and just because I have it handy, here's how to figure out a player's passer rating: (((Comp % - 30)/20) + ((Yds Att - 3)/4) + (td %/5) + (2.375- (int %/4))) x 100)/ 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 Elways cumulative SB rating is 58.01. 686934[/snapback] My bad, it's actually 58.02 if I ciphered right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 If only Tarkenton was a few inches taller. There's a reason that NFL teams like taller QBs and watching Fran play in the Super Bowls was one of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunysteelfly76 Posted February 6, 2005 Author Share Posted February 6, 2005 My bad, it's actually 58.02 if I ciphered right. 686957[/snapback] Close, it's 59.3. I missed the San Fran game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retrograde assault Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 You left out Staubach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 I see a common theme in that list. Average 1 int or less and you wont lose a Super Bowl. It isn't brain surgery but is nice to see that the stats support it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunysteelfly76 Posted February 6, 2005 Author Share Posted February 6, 2005 You left out Staubach. 686965[/snapback] :doah: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunysteelfly76 Posted February 7, 2005 Author Share Posted February 7, 2005 Tommy Boy definately ranks with some of the best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrambled Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 The Elway #s are wrong: 86 vs NY - 22-37-304, 1 td, 1 int 87 vs Was - 14-38-257, 1, 3 89 vs SF - 10-26-108, 2 ints 97 vs GB - 12-22-123, 1 int 98 vs Atl - 18-29-336, 1 td, 1 int Totals: 76-152, 1128, 3 tds, 8 ints. 686925[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.