DawgTalk Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 I was looking around and came across something that made me feel a little bit better about my Browns...and another reason why they sucked it up. (still love 'em) Top 5 hardest 2004 Schedules. 1. Cleveland Browns .590, 151-105 2. Oakland Raiders .570, 146-110 3. Miami Dolphins .555, 142-114 T-4. Baltimore Ravens .551, 141-115 T-4. Kansas City Chiefs .551, 141-115 Maybe an easier schedule next year??? Here is the rest of the league strength of schedules http://www.nfl.com/news/story/8063536 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loaf Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 even with the easiest of schedules, I don't see the them being much better than they were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piranha Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Hey new coach, (and a good one) you never know... What's the status on Garcia anyway, heard anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easy n Dirty Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 That strength of schedule can be a misleading, especially this past season when there were a couple clear-cut elite teams with exceptional records. Example is the Jets - with a .523 winning percentage for their opponents cumulatively, it looks like they had a tough schedule. however, if you eliminate just three games (Patriots twice and Steelers), their remaining opponents had a winning percentage of .437. And I know from following the Jets closely all season that they did have a pretty gentle schedule this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Compared to the teams in their division, the Browns are always going to be at a disadvantage when it comes to strength of schedule simply because they don't get to play themselves twice a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackshi17 Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 Compared to the teams in their division, the Browns are always going to be at a disadvantage when it comes to strength of schedule simply because they don't get to play themselves twice a year. 689341[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 Compared to the teams in their division, the Browns are always going to be at a disadvantage when it comes to strength of schedule simply because they don't get to play themselves twice a year. 689341[/snapback] That's just COLD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 That;s the only thing about my Chiefs, they are top 5 in this category every year. They could go 1-15 and still be in the top 5 in SOS the next year. Bank on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phenom Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 That;s the only thing about my Chiefs, they are top 5 in this category every year. They could go 1-15 and still be in the top 5 in SOS the next year. Bank on it. 690236[/snapback] I think teams in the AFC West always have a tough schedule............. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.