The Vatican Hitsquad Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 (edited) Word is Al has his sites on Jordon at RB, but I don't know how since they jsut signed Porter, Franchised Woodson and picke dup this contract. When tehy Deep 6 Gannon (and hopefully Sapp) it will free up the dough, but by trading away Harris on Def it leaves them thin. Edited February 23, 2005 by The Vatican Hitsquad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSab Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 We will have to wait and see if this is true> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Men In Tights Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 What happens to Culpepper, does he stay the #2 rated QB, and does this mean Minnesota drafts Mike Williams with the 7th pick, or if they get really lucky Braylon Edwards? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Rectum Fire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 What happens to Culpepper, does he stay the #2 rated QB,and does this mean Minnesota drafts Mike Williams with the 7th pick, or if they get really lucky Braylon Edwards? 709175[/snapback] Culpepepper's #'s weren't that great with Moss out of the lineup. I'm not touching the guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Culpepepper's #'s weren't that great with Moss out of the lineup. I'm not touching the guy. 709183[/snapback] I'll let him slip...maybe take him in the late 2nd and hope he gets more rushing TD's..... but, then again...there are much better options at better value a round or 2 later... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Yeah, but losing Napoleon Harris they will be *** on defense. 709148[/snapback] And they weren't already? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 I'll let him slip...maybe take him in the late 2nd and hope he gets more rushing TD's..... but, then again...there are much better options at better value a round or 2 later... 709185[/snapback] I'll let someone else take the chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NAUgrad Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 (edited) If this comes true, it's going to suck to be a Denver fan!!! We own the Raiders. Edited February 23, 2005 by NAUgrad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 I'll let someone else take the chance. 709192[/snapback] after free agency and the draft....my outlook might be the same.... I have to wait and see what wideout they'll bring in through free agency.... I am almost positive they'll add another very good WR...maybe Derrick Mason?...Muhsin Muhammed?... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 If Moss leaves, then Culpeppers drops - no question. If he goes to the Raiders, then Collings goes up - no doubt. Might make things a bit interesting if that ever transpired - have OAK with Porter and Moss, and then pick up a young buck RB in the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 If this comes true, it's going to suck to be a Denver fan!!! We own the Raiders. 709194[/snapback] I had the same thought as a Charger fan! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcmast Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Now the Packers won't have to draft a DB with their first round pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 What about the really important question...who wears 84? 709127[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Now the Packers won't have to draft a DB with their first round pick. 709206[/snapback] no...I think they still need a DB if they want to make the playoffs...but, then again with favre likely retiring.....their problem won't be on defense as much as it will be at QB.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guggs Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Who will the Vikes pick with the 7th overall pick? By the way, I am not happy with the Vikings trading Moss. Even though his attitude sucks, they win with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 (edited) I would love to see what Mike Williams could do if the Moss trade is a done deal. Not too excited about only getting one defensive player and only one early (with or without a later pick added) for a highlight reel that is Randy Moss. Edited February 24, 2005 by MikesVikes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 (edited) I'll let someone else take the chance. 709192[/snapback] I'd take that chance in the 2nd round, easy. Let's review some Culpepper stats from last season: - most passing yards (4717) - 2nd best QB rating of the the regular starters (110.9) - 2nd best completion ratio of the regular starters (69.2%) - 2nd most passing TDs (39) - only a moderate number of INTs (11) The only major negative stat from last year was that Culpepper was tied with Vick for being sacked the 2nd most times of any QB: 46 times. Granted, how free agency and the draft play out will have a major impact on Culpepper's value. But he's valuable with or without Moss. Though, McNabb and Manning certainly go first. Edited February 23, 2005 by yo mama Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Excuse me, but before we all go into a feeding frenzy over this proposed trade, does anybody know for sure whether or not Moss can veto a trade to the Raiders? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyBalata Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 (edited) I guess you're not thrilled by this news. 709167[/snapback] NO! Not for the announced deal I am not happy at all! Edited February 23, 2005 by BillyBalata Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 (edited) Excuse me, but before we all go into a feeding frenzy over this proposed trade, does anybody know for sure whether or not Moss can veto a trade to the Raiders? 709225[/snapback] No idea what his contract says. But TO effectively blocked being traded to the Ravens last year. So even if Moss doesn't have the contractual ability, that's not to say he can't do it anyways. Edited February 23, 2005 by yo mama Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Now being reported on KFFL and ESPN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziachild007 Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Tyring to think, has Collins ever really had that much talent to throw to? Off the top of my head, he had Moose in Carolina only for a short time (I htink), in NY he had Toomer & Hilliard in NY, and last year had Curry, Porter and Gabriel. But IMO, he has never really had a big time go to guy. I think it would be very interesting to see what he would do with Porter & Moss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 NO! Not for the announced deal I am not happy at all! 709227[/snapback] Don't worry - all you have to do is win the Smackbowl again to get your new Raider helmet! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Now being reported on KFFL and ESPN. 709234[/snapback] They are both merely using the AP feed which itself quotes the Pioneer Press Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.