Avernus Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 I was thinking...when a race for 2nd place is tied beteen 2-3 players and the rest have like 1-3 votes.....should we do a poll to avoid the randomness?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarge5121976 Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 I was thinking...when a race for 2nd place is tied beteen 2-3 players and the rest have like 1-3 votes.....should we do a poll to avoid the randomness?? 900732[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 Hadn't you already done this a few times? I think it's working well when you do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted July 29, 2005 Author Share Posted July 29, 2005 Hadn't you already done this a few times? I think it's working well when you do it. 900763[/snapback] that was a playoff for the current pick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Irish Doggy Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 I was thinking...when a race for 2nd place is tied beteen 2-3 players and the rest have like 1-3 votes.....should we do a poll to avoid the randomness?? 900732[/snapback] I'm not sure what you're proposing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piranha Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 Sure what the heck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted July 29, 2005 Author Share Posted July 29, 2005 I'm not sure what you're proposing. 900781[/snapback] to roll over the previous pick and take the ones that seperate themselves from the others to avoid having like 5-7 picks in the same vote... like last round c-pep - 9, to - 9, holt - 7...pick 15 would be between those 3 instead of a new round... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 to roll over the previous pick and take the ones that seperate themselves from the others to avoid having like 5-7 picks in the same vote... like last round c-pep - 9, to - 9, holt - 7...pick 15 would be between those 3 instead of a new round... 900801[/snapback] Bad idea. Run it like Skippy has run it (quite successfully); no need to change it noob! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted July 29, 2005 Author Share Posted July 29, 2005 Bad idea. Run it like Skippy has run it (quite successfully); no need to change it noob! 900926[/snapback] darnit...I am not a newb!!!!...I noticed that everything was going extremely slow... figured why waste time when the next pick is going to obviously be between the same people?....and as you can see...the 15th pick is basically between the same 3 players we would have run-off...except you have players like rudi and cumart being selected that would be more valuable if they went toward a pick that is actually in contention at this point.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Weasel Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 darnit...I am not a newb!!!!...I noticed that everything was going extremely slow... figured why waste time when the next pick is going to obviously be between the same people?....and as you can see...the 15th pick is basically between the same 3 players we would have run-off...except you have players like rudi and cumart being selected that would be more valuable if they went toward a pick that is actually in contention at this point.. 900949[/snapback] I agree with Avernus. That being said, I vote for CuMar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.